![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 May 2004 21:25:59 -0500, "tscottme"
wrote: I ask because I've heard NASA folks mentioning that the Shuttle, at some point in it's descent, is going Mach 25. I claim that means the vehicle is going 25 times faster than Mach at that particular pressure and temp where the Shuttle is, while someone else claims NASA means 25 times the sea level value of Mach, even though the Shuttle is in the very upper atmosphere at the time. [I'm sorry to be so late in replying, but life got weird and it took me a little while to get back to this. MFS] It's a definition thing. The Orbiter goes Mach 25, by definition, until the dynamic pressure gets high enough to be sensed, which is at (surprise!) Mach 25. If you use the real dynamic pressure, which is zero, the Mach number goes to infinity, so we set it to Mach 25 by definition to avoid that. It isn't sea level Mach number for that airspeed. No one uses "equivalent Mach number". That's because the aerodynamics and aerothermodynamics are functions of Mach number, so it has to be local. This means you're right and someone else is wrong. Perhaps that someone else is confused by equivalent airspeed, usually presented by PAO as miles per hour. That is the sea-level airspeed that the airplane would have to fly at to have the same Mach number at sea level that it has at altitude. I don't have my calculator or my standard atmosphere here, so the numbers I'm about to give you will be only approximate. Flying Mach 3 at 80,000 ft is an indicated airspeed of about 300 knots (300 KIAS). At sea level, the equivalent airspeed would be about 3,000 fps, which you'll have to convert to knots (this will be KEAS). I know to discount what reporters say, but I'm referring to engineers and their official spokesmen. You can check this in "Space Shuttle Hypersonic Aerodynamic and Aerothermodynamic Flight Research and the Comparison to Ground Test Results", Kenneth W. Iliff and Mary F. Shafer, NASA-TM-4499, June, 1993. If you go to http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/DTRS/1993/Bib/H-1894.html there's a link to a pdf version. One of the early references explains the air data system, including this Mach number definition. Mary -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
max altitude and Mach 1 Now With Charts | John R Weiss | Military Aviation | 6 | May 15th 04 05:49 PM |
F-22 Comparison | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 39 | December 4th 03 04:25 PM |
WWII warplanes vs combat sim realism | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 37 | November 27th 03 05:24 AM |
The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience | John Carrier | Military Aviation | 54 | October 12th 03 04:59 AM |
Me-262, NOT Bell X-1 Broke SB First | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 140 | October 10th 03 08:02 PM |