A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

High Vis Markings



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old January 28th 16, 03:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Don Johnstone[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 398
Default High Vis Markings

At 05:03 28 January 2016, Ramy wrote:

Not intending to offend anyone, just to solicit thought, not rote

acceptance. Show me the beef. (by way of full disclosure, I not

not eat beef).

Assuming no one is considering wrapping their whole glider in

orange glow,
=
only the wing tips, part of the rudder and maybe part of the nose.

How
coul=
d this possibly act as camouflage?? By reducing the visible wing

span by
le=
ss than 5%? This sounds like a myth. Worst case scenario it will

have no
im=
pact, base case scenario the small orange surface will catch your
attention=
and save your life. So instead of debating it to death, best is to

just
pu=
rchase a stripe of orange vinyl (less than $50) and stick it to your

wing
t=
ip/winglets/rudder. It will make your glider look prettier, more

unique,
an=
d maybe even safer. And if you dont like it - remove it...

Ramy


Camouflage works by breaking up the outline of a familiar object so
that the eye/brain does not recognise it, or alternatively confuses
the eye/brain.
British soldiers in your war of independence wore red coats,
because red made it difficult for the enemy to count the number of
soldiers, to camouflage the size of their force . Ships in WW1 were
painted in garish zig-zag patterns which broke up the outline so
they were less likely to be recognised as ships and made range
estimation difficult. It is not as simple as it seems.
Sticking it to your rudder is a bad idea, as has been pointed out
earlier. Altering the mass balance of a control surface, even by a
small amount, without comprehensive testing, is unlikely to end
well.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aircraft Markings Stretch Aviation Photos 4 January 13th 08 12:39 PM
HC-1 SH-3 1972 markings ? Mike Weeks Naval Aviation 0 May 17th 07 04:12 AM
B-29 tail markings Peter Twydell Military Aviation 11 September 10th 04 10:28 AM
High Visibility markings research? Craig Reynolds Soaring 2 June 3rd 04 11:25 PM
P51 maintenance markings Serge Seguret Restoration 1 May 26th 04 02:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.