A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Information for all users of Flarm, OEM FLARM supplier and Flarm PowerFlarm



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 3rd 16, 11:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default Information for all users of Flarm, OEM FLARM supplier and Flarm PowerFlarm

On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 12:25:43 PM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:
As a (retired) systems engineer, I read the analysis on strictly
technical terms, no worries about personalities, profits, fixed
costs or any other possible motivations.* I only saw the possibility
of 64 second dropouts, not the certainty.* I saw no denigration of
the efficacy of Flarm in its intended role, only that the encryption
of its transmissions could possibly result in
erroneous position reporting.* Maybe the author would have been
better received had he left out the talk about monopolies, etc.



It is my understanding that the reason for Flarm signals to be
encrypted was to thwart a rogue group of Brits (tongue deeply in
cheek) from using a network of cheap receivers to receive and
process Flarm signals to post the locations of the gliders on a
webpage for them to track the progress of the gliders in flight.*
And if I'm correct in that recollection, isn't that what the other
sailplane trackers currently do?* Not necessarily using Flarm
signals, but some other means to display the locations and tracks of
gliders.




On 3/3/2016 12:18 PM,
wrote:



I'll wait for more info on the alleged technical problem. As for the attitude that "FLARM risked time and money to develop a proprietary technology that a lot of pilots want and now that it's successful, we don't think it's fair unless it's shared" (translation: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs), until such time as Bernie dispatches Hillary and then the Donald, I have no problem with this kind of "monopoly", at least in the U.S.

Chip Bearden





--

Dan, 5J


My reading of it isn't that it transmits erroneous positions (which would be bad) but that it does not transmit positions at all, or the transmissions that it makes cannot be decrypted and would be ignored. In other words the same situation as if that particular glider had no Flarm. In the US anyway, many don't, you better be looking for them anyway!!!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flarm IGC files on non-IGC certified Flarm? Movses Soaring 21 March 16th 15 09:59 PM
PowerFLARM Core secondary FLARM antenna [email protected] Soaring 27 October 7th 14 01:53 PM
Car Flarm [email protected] Soaring 18 February 8th 14 02:31 AM
PowerFLARM News Updates on my FLARM web page Paul Remde Soaring 10 March 6th 13 04:50 AM
Flarm v5 Kevin Neave[_2_] Soaring 5 February 23rd 11 01:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.