A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Shameless update from Dale Kramer



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 16th 16, 08:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Steve Koerner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 430
Default Shameless update from Dale Kramer

On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 1:12:18 PM UTC-7, DaleKramer wrote:
Hi Steve,
The transitions should be very quick. Thrust to weight will be about 1.3/1 so acceleration into cruise should be very quick. Landing transitions will basically be just a normal final approach to a touchdown spot but with the idea of being 50 ft high (or so) when you get there. This transition will be very easy to verify and demonstrate with the 1/4 scale. Can always add a few more pounds of battery if needed.
I am hoping to design the gear such that a single person can tip it from tail to nosegear if it gets windy for a tiedown.
What will be strange is that the 'ideal' landing direction will be a 90 degree crosswind landing wrt wind efects.
Great comments!
I saw that for Nephi, hope it continues for a while. Can't afford a glider yet.
Thanks,
Dale


It will be interesting to see how that vertical landing works out with the model. I can't visualize how a normal approach speed can get you to a vertical position. Without thrust vector control it seems like it would require a high approach speed in order to then pull up to a vertical position and begin backing.

Have you modeled the vertical landing? How high does the aircraft get if things are done correctly? What speed does it back down at? Will the landing be autonomous or pilot controlled?

I can swallow the idea of vertical take-off much more readily than the landing. Maybe I'm just not visualizing the dynamics of the landing problem correctly.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Art Kramer Andrew Chaplin Military Aviation 8 July 12th 04 11:25 PM
Art Kramer, your computer may be infected old hoodoo Military Aviation 6 May 24th 04 12:43 PM
Question for Art Kramer. M. H. Greaves Military Aviation 2 May 10th 04 05:17 PM
More B-26 Nonsense from Art Kramer funkraum Military Aviation 7 January 21st 04 10:53 PM
ATTN: Art Kramer robert arndt Military Aviation 2 July 4th 03 02:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.