![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Snip...
Of course, there are a minority of Darwin-affirming chuckleheads out there that skew the statistics and make us all look bad. Paul A. Jupiter, FL "What Paul A. said." No matter what else you do as a pilot, do try to avoid induction into the Chucklehead Hall of Fame. Thanks to the all for today's thoughtful replies. It'd be really nifty if others pondering sharing their thoughts did so, too, even if they violently disagree (though it'd be additionally nifty if we can keep the disagreements civil! [For the record, when used in the manner above, in my book "chucklehead" is quite civil. ![]() Of greater importance - thinks I - than "merely" WHAT a person's opinions are, is WHY they are. So by all means, share that part, too! Because it's the "why" bits that tend to drive formation, growth and development of the "what" bits. By way of example (to indulge in a bit of ad-hominem humor), while I may or may not care IF someone thinks I'm an idiot, I'm always genuinely curious WHY they may think that way! Considering "low saves," I began my "XC career" with a "hard-deck-based" numerical guideline volunteered to me by my fight instructor. Over the years, influenced both by increasing experience and "situational awareness," I "en-fuzzed the number," coming to rely instead on a daily collage of factors (e.g. terrain, currency, physical/mental state, local weather, etc.). Funnily enough, I've found my instructor's number amazingly applicable to most situations; once or twice I thought it FAR more aggressive than the situation warranted (and flew accordingly, of course); and a few other times I've intentionally scratched below "my instructor's hard deck." (Whether I climbed out or landed isn't importance in the context of "safety," but kinda-sorta related, I've found every time I've "gotten stuck down low" it takes a solid 30 minutes to dig myself out of the hole, no matter the minimum height agl. I began tracking that once I began wondering just how costly-in-time it was!) On the off chance lurkers may be reading and pondering on thoughts expressed in this thread (and being thoughtful about soaring is almost always a good thing!), in addition to the (Most Excellent!) links posted by T8 in the "Boy Who Flew With Condors" thread, I'll offer one; it's dated on the personal front, but has withstood the test of time on the soaring front. http://soarboulder.org/index.php?opt...1&I temid=190 Bob W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
737 thinks it's a DC-10? | Kingfish | Piloting | 87 | November 15th 07 07:16 PM |
Is it just me that thinks this was stupid | Bravo Two Zero | Piloting | 55 | May 17th 07 06:30 AM |
RAF Pilot looking for sailplane | Incipient Sinner | Soaring | 0 | May 9th 06 08:20 AM |
Mini Helicopter Thinks for Itself | NewsBOT | Simulators | 0 | February 18th 05 09:46 PM |
For the "wannabe" self-launching sailplane pilot | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 0 | January 3rd 05 10:31 PM |