![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My thinking is that for a wind blowing towards the east, the top of the
rotor is also blowing east and the bottom of the rotor is blowing west, so the lift side of the rotor is to the west of the sink side. This is idealized because if the feature causing the wave is convoluted and irregular, all sorts of chaotic interactions can result in unpredictable patterns. That's right, and I don't think it can be predicted, hence my original position that I would not penetrate upwind looking for the up side of the rotor unless I had plenty of altitude AGL and a place to bail out (figuratively). I have personally worked rotor up into wave an several occasions, but I've always had at least 5K' AGL when I did it. This is the nature of western flying. -- Dan, 5J |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Propellors vs Rotors | Don W | Home Built | 50 | March 16th 06 06:47 AM |
relative climb performance | Soaring | 8 | September 17th 05 07:21 PM | |
An Erudite Discourse on the Relative Merits and Demerits of the Various Styles of Hangar Doors | jls | Home Built | 1 | October 1st 04 01:52 AM |
Airspeed Indication and Relative Wind | Scott Lowrey | Piloting | 24 | May 8th 04 08:20 PM |
"Dirty Tricks" and "Both Sides Do It" | Leslie Swartz | Military Aviation | 19 | March 29th 04 06:11 PM |