A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

For Keith Willshaw...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old June 11th 04, 09:00 PM
Tank Fixer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
on 08 Jun 2004 21:58:19 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

As a result Kimmel and Short were sent a message that
began "This is to be considered a war warning"


They also added that Pearl Harbor was only possible target.period.


Bullcrap

It did no such thing and to state otherwise is dishonest.

You have proven you havn't read the war warning that was sent on 28 Nov 1941


So which is it ?
Did he try to contact people or do nothing


Do you think that Navy and Army units in Pasific were alerted and waiting for
Japanase to attack?


They had been givin warning on 28 Nov.


Hardly a blueprint of the Pearl Harbor attack plan.


You could only say that if officers of US military intelligence had NOT told to
their superiors cleary "Target is Pearl Harbor" but they did say exactly that
since Nov,28.


When and where did they do so ?

So since Nov,28 they knew the target thanks to work of a few men.
Since their superiors did not respond to their warnings one of
them,Thurman,sidestepped the line of command and personaly went all way up to
White House,with very clear warning of japanase attack with the name of the
target "Pearl Harbor".


Reprinting a lie does not make it so. The 14 part message had no referance
to any target.



For you I'm sure thats true.


Put the blame on Guetenberg and also countless creators of the "
Information Age".


Perhaps you should try reading some and come back ?


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Videos: Su-37 Superflanker vs F-22 Raptor Alejandro Magno Military Aviation 20 January 10th 04 05:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.