A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

F-4 w/AIM-9 and bombs carriage question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old June 13th 04, 10:19 PM
Ed Rasimus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 21:02:14 GMT, Guy Alcala
wrote:

I've been looking through Shlomo Aloni's Osprey book on
Israeli F-4 Phantom aces, and I note that around the time of
the '73 war when they want to carry AIM-9s, they either

1. don't carry any A/G stores on that pylon (when carrying
two AIM-9D/Gs on the shoulder mounts), or

2. only carry a single AIM-9D/G on one shoulder mount and
delete the store carried on the same side (i.e., either the
I/B or O/B side) station of the TER.

Because they seem to have valued the AIM-9 far more than the
AIM-7 for their strikers, the Israelis were often flying
with a highly assymetric load, i.e. 5 M117s on the C/L, 3
M117s on the right I/B, and two AIM-9s on the left I/B, plus
two tanks. I know that USAF F-4s were only able to fire
AIM-9s OR drop bombs on a single mission prior to 1973 or so
owing to wiring limitations (which is probably represented
by condition 1 above), but condition 2 above implies that
there's a clearance problem even after the wiring was
changed. The Israelis later went so far as to develop an
adapter for the forward right Sparrow well that allowed an
IRM to be carried there, which allowed them to carry two
bombs plus one AIM-9/Python 3 on the left I/B, decreasing
the assymetry to almost nothing and increasing the bombload
while still carrying a pair of IRMs. Can any of our
resident F-4 types comment as to whether there were such
clearance restrictions for simultaneous AIM-9/bomb carriage?

TIA,

Guy


I'm not able to comment on what the IAF was doing, but can make a
couple of observations about the USAF aircraft at the time. The AIM-9
was carried on a "T" launcher suspended from the 14" suspension points
on the MAU-12 adapter on the I/B pylons. Two missiles could be carried
on each I/B station. No other equipment could be carried on the pylon.
Typical A/A configured flights carried 4xAIM-9, 3xAIM-7, an ECM pod in
a forward Sparrow well and three tanks.

By 1974 a mod had been designed for the pylon that allowed for
shoulder carriage of the AIM-9. These bolt-on stations were on either
side of the pylon and allowed for the IR missiles to be carried and
fired with any other normally suspended store on the usual gear.

(I've got to opine that the problem of firing missiles from the
station with ordnance seems moot--if you engage enemy aircraft, step
one is dump the iron.)

It is possible that the IAF were also carrying ALE-40 or similar
locally produced chaff/flare dispensers. The ALE-40 blisters on the
trailing edge of the side of the pylon might have been the problem for
the shoulder mounted AIM-9s.


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
Smithsonian Institution Press
ISBN #1-58834-103-8
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Mosquito fighter-bomber tactics question Kari Korpi Military Aviation 6 April 5th 04 09:09 AM
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing zxcv Military Aviation 55 April 4th 04 07:05 AM
Viggen armament question Kari Korpi Military Aviation 0 March 5th 04 09:47 PM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.