A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dick Johnson methodology for measuring glider performance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21  
Old July 12th 16, 06:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 580
Default Dick Johnson methodology for measuring glider performance

I don't disagree with this post but I would say that, overall, DJ's testing was good at pointing out the gliders that performed particularly well compared with its competitors - and this was often confirmed by the choices of top competition pilots. Example: ASW20 versus Mini Nimbus and LS3a.

It worked the other way, too. When DJ tested the ASW 20 and LS-3 (not the later LS-3a), they both had remarkable, essentially equal performance. This was confirmed by those who flew the two gliders in that first year or two (ours was delivered in 1978). For a brief period, they were equally favored by competition pilots in the U.S.

Then the rush to the ASW 20 began. At first this was a bit baffling. Except for the higher wing weight of the LS-3, what was there about the '20 that seemed to capture so many pilots' favor? Then it became evident that the two types were no longer equal. They still climbed together but the '20 had an advantage in glide.

I profiled the top surface of my LS-3 wings and discovered a "flat spot" where post curing had apparently shrunk the wing over the spar cap. Building up this flat spot fully restored the glide performance, equally dramatically compared with other types as well as other LS-3s. A few owners (e.g., Jim Cox, IIRC) went even further, building up the leading edge where the profile was apparently a bit too blunt compared with the published coordinates as well as fixing the flat spot, with similarly impressive results.

But by that point, not only had time passed the LS-3 by but DJ's tests of the LS-3a seemed to indicate that the later version had inferior glide performance right out of the box, allegedly because of a thicker profile caused by the molds not being completely stable (see heated exchange of letters in "Soaring" mag about that time). My own impression was that the early LS-3a gliders were quite good, but that impression didn't last.

In any case, the reputation of the LS-3 remains today as inferior to the original ASW 20a despite DJ's original published test.

Chip Bearden
ASW 24 "JB"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dick Johnson Clint Soaring 4 June 6th 09 10:40 PM
Texas Glider Rally / Dick Johnson Wave Camp April 4 - 11 at Marfa Burt Compton - Marfa Soaring 2 March 27th 09 06:55 PM
Dick Johnson is gone. Burt Compton - Marfa Soaring 23 July 27th 08 05:38 PM
Dick Johnson's FTE of the Discus-2 Flavio Formosa Soaring 1 January 18th 07 03:18 PM
Contacts of Dick Johnson Francisco De Almeida Soaring 1 January 1st 06 06:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.