![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Simon Robbins" wrote in message ...
"David Harper" wrote in message om... Does the C-130 have two 1553 buses onboard? One for flight control and one for EW/mission systems? I don't think 1553 is used for flight control since the latency and speed isn't sufficient. Mission systems may well use it though. I think by nature 1553 is dual-redundant so that's where you might get the idea of two from. Not familiar with the C-130 personally though. Si Thanks for the info. So none of the flight controls interface with the 1553 at all? I'm just now getting familiar with Mil-HDBK-516 (airworthiness criteria) for my new job and not sure if some of the equipment we are installing on the 1553 bus would affect/cause latency for flight control. From what you've said, apparently that's a non-issue then... I guess on a non-related note, how exactly does equipment on the 1553 bus manage communications to prevent them from overlapping / "stepping on" each other? Is there something in the data sentence once a unit begins transmitting that puts all other equipment on "hold" until it is done sending data? Wouldn't there be interrupts needed for critical equipment to override less critical sentences? Thanks again! Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|