![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"John Carrier" writes: Top Posting fixed, to improve following teh context "Peter Stickney" wrote in message ... In article , "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" writes: Ian MacLure wrote: Operationally its irrlevant because the FAA limits speed below 10K ft to 250Kts IIRC. As to the actual max speed attainable at low altitude, I believe you have it correct. Agreed. Thicker air equals lower speed. FAA equals even lower speed. Not necessarily - thicker air also = much more thrust. It's all pretty much a wash, with a transonic airplane. Usually the TAS in units/time (mph, kts, km/hr) is higher, but the Mach Number's a bit lower. *The Speed of Sound is proportional to absolute temperature. It's warmer near the surface, so there's more mph/Mach Number. Generally not true. Indicated airspeed top end is usually highest at low altitude, but true airspeed capability will rise with increased altitude. This all assumes no airframe structural limit, which is frequently below the aircraft's capabilities in commercial designs. John, I have to respectfully disagree. While I don't have the specifics for a 757 or 767, here's a list of the thrust/drag limits (Which often exceed the published flight limits) for a number of similarly performing transonic military aircraft. The data sources are teh Standard Aircraft Characteristics for each aircraft, which uses the same flight test data used to create the Pilot's Handbooks and NATOPS. All are Standard Day conditions Sea Level 35,000' Notes Vmax Vmax Mmax Vmax Vmax Mmax (Placard Limits, etc.) KTAS KEAS KTAS KEAS F-86H 600 600 0.91 545 304 0.94 B-47E 545 545 0.83 485 270 0.85 Lim. 425 KEAS/M 0.86 B-57B 521 521 0.79 475 262 0.83 Lim. 500 KEAS/M 0.83 A-3A 545 545 0.83 510 284 0.89 AV-8B 575 575 0.87 528 294 0.92 S-3A 430 430 0.65 443 324 0.72 Vmax is at 20,000' Of all the examples, the S-3 comes eth closest to, say, an airliner, with its fat body and high bypass engines. Even so, there isn't much difference. The thing driving drag the most is Mach Number. (The drag rise due to compressibility getting going) Since Mach 1 is about 85 Kts lower at 35,000' than it is at Sea Level, It's not too surprising that you'll have more knots in hand at low altitudes. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Aircraft engine certification FAR's | Corky Scott | Home Built | 4 | July 25th 03 06:46 PM |