![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/9/2016 3:58 PM, Bob T wrote:
Snip A really scary comment in the NTSB final report: "Postaccident examination of the glider's release system revealed that it was missing a spring, which likely resulted in the cable not engaging in the detent and caused the premature release from the tow line." http://www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.av...04X34426&key=1 It was a bumpy day. I took off about 10 minutes of Bob and hit strong turbulence and sink over the last few hundred yards of the runway. My 200 foot countdown took much longer than usual, but, as I continued on tow, finally got up and found a good thermal and left the area, unaware of the crash that had occurred behind me. Bob was a very experienced jet pilot with thousands of hours, but had just gotten into gliding and had only recently purchased the glider. Having his glider release itself because of a faulty release mechanism in turbulence only 100 ft. AGL and only desert trees ahead, our newbe pilot made the unfortunate fatal decision to turn back and spun in. When was the last time YOU had your release checked by a professional??? "Right on!" regarding "known-good release health." Philosophical agreement aside...if (big "if") the release was an original Aerotek release, I've a hard time getting my head around the NTSB's "missing spring" possibility (though if it happens, it must be possible). So far as I'm aware, every Zuni left the factory with a clone of Dick Schreder's dirt-simple HP release (used in every HP I've examined, including up to HP-16's and one HP-18). The original release uses a single spring, easily visible (assuming the cockpit-side of the release wasn't subsequently enclosed by some sort of doghouse). But more to the point, without the spring the original release simply doesn't *work* properly - as in, requiring active, precise-and-fiddly, action (on-the-rope-connnector-person's-part), to make a tension-holding connection. I know because I tried both my HP-14 and Zuni (S/N 3)releases sans-spring, on the ground, just out of curiosity. As it was, even with a properly functioning release, part of my pre-launch routine was describing to (almost!) every rope-connecting-person how to connect the rope (a task Joe Pilot could not assist with from within the cockpit). Whereas having "Joe Average Connector Person" make a successful connection with a functioning spring is "verbally trivial" from Joe Pilot's perspective, I doubt I could have talked through J.A.C. Person into making a(n apparently) secure connection in the absence of a spring. Memory says that doing so requires two hands, one with access to the interior/cockpit side of the release. Now if the spring failed or somehow came loose, I'd expect an immediate back release the instant the rope lost tension for any reason. Bob W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parowan Fatal Crash | ContestID67[_2_] | Soaring | 30 | July 3rd 09 03:43 AM |
Rare fatal CH-801 crash | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 8 | June 22nd 09 03:24 AM |
Fatal crash in NW Washington | Rich S.[_1_] | Home Built | 1 | February 17th 08 02:38 AM |
Fatal Crash | Monty | General Aviation | 1 | December 12th 07 09:06 PM |
Fatal Crash in Fittstown, OK | GeorgeC | Piloting | 3 | March 7th 06 05:03 AM |