A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old September 23rd 16, 07:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

I have flown with the Butterfly for three seasons. It was difficult to install as its sensor unit needs to be mostly well clear of any magnets or any moving ferrous control rods. It turns out that most of our gliders have been magnetized a bit in their lifetime. Dave Nadler told me that they tried to incorporate some sort of compass data in the SN10 but were unable to overcome that obstacle. After moving all speakers behind my head and getting the inertial sensor unit away from moving metal I finally got it working. It has some built in compensation which works for some weak standing magnetic fields but not moving ones, such as a control rod or speaker magnet. That took most of a year to sort out. It does work as advertised, giving real time wind information. The question is, does that help in finding and centering lift?
Years ago Al Leffler helped me learn to fly the Mojave shear line on blue days. He said that when, in doubt, the lift is probably downwind. That was and is good advice. In the west most of our flying utilizes some form of convergence. Over the years the phenomenon has been called, DEW line, shear line, convergence, and most recently "energy lines. I mostly fly from Siskiyou County airport in Montague, CA, We have a convergence that routinely sets up east of mount Shasta and extends easterly for about 50 miles. It appears to be a combination of converging anabatic thermals from the two sides of a wide mountain ridge, and meeting of northerly valley winds from north with the prevailing southwesterly winds from the south. The Butterfly real time winds do reliably steer you to the convergence and have helped me choose which side of the clouds to cruise. Of course experienced pilots will figure that out anyway but every little advantage helps.
There may be information displayed that would help centering thermals. Do horizontal gusts converge from all sides in a thermal?
The little wind arrow is easy to interpret and quickly becomes part of your scan and need not become a safety issue. According to Richard (Craggy Aero), the Lx Varios. (S8,S80,V7) have similar sensors and should be capable of producing similar information. I have an S80 in another glider and I do not think the wind calculations are as "real time" as the Butterfly. As a side note, after years of flying with the Ilec. SN10 I think it is still the best at computing and displaying average winds.
DLB
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
302 wind calculation AK Soaring 21 April 3rd 10 01:27 PM
302 wind calculation 5Z Soaring 1 March 26th 10 11:56 AM
302 wind calculation Darryl Ramm Soaring 0 March 26th 10 03:04 AM
302 wind calculation AK Soaring 0 March 26th 10 02:47 AM
Vector Wind, Relative Wind calculation C 302/303 [email protected] Soaring 2 December 9th 08 07:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.