![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 13:03 03 October 2016, Tango Whisky wrote:
Le dimanche 2 octobre 2016 20:57:45 UTC+2, Jonathan St. Cloud a =C3=A9crit= =C2=A0: In the eighty's or nineties there was an article in "Soaring" by an U.S. = Army Apache trainee, who noticed he could see raising thermal through his m= onocle. Not sure which sensor array was picking that up, but I thought it = was the FLIR. =20 On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 11:04:32 AM UTC-7, David Hirst wrote: On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 4:04:39 AM UTC+13, Jonathan St. Cloud wro= te: A FLIR unit might offer a visual indication from much larger distance= ? =20 A few moons ago, I got chatting to a guy selling FLIR imaging systems a= t a trade show. I asked him about the problem of trying to see thermals, s= o we set an imager up to look at the hot air rising from a nearby vent and = saw nothing (as he expected). =20 There's no problem seeing warm solid objects, since they consist of a l= ot of closely-packed warm emitters - high spatial density - but warm gas is= so much more diffuse that any infrared 'brightness' just fades into the ba= ckground, like a small amount of dye in a large volume of liquid. To do ef= fective background subtraction, you need to know what the background is to = begin with and on a typical thermal day this is the average temperature of = the air which has high spatial variability. I think birds can see all those rising insects, which makes the birds t= he best thermal indicators, if they can be bothered to fly where we want th= em to. =20 DH TX You cannot detect hot air from a distance by any infrared detector (and FLI= R is infrared imaging). Obviously, your sales guy wasn't up to speed with p= hysics. Hot air emits infrard radiation. However, as emission and absorption coeffi= cients are the same thing, the air inbetween the thermal and your FLIR will= absorb all of this radiation, and you won't see anything on your imager. T= hat's how physics works. The stories about people having seen infrared imag= es of thermals are just urband legends. Bert (who has been developing infrared sensors and systems for more than 15= years) In the early 70's Wally Scott was flying a OD Green 1-34 ? for MIT and they were trying to see dust particles in thermals in west texas. with todays tech. it may be possible.any body else remember this. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Continued commercial development of Lidar thermal detection | Craig Funston[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | February 25th 13 09:58 PM |
Remote thermal detection | Bill D | Soaring | 18 | October 24th 12 09:22 PM |
Possible remote thermal finder? | bildan | Soaring | 12 | January 23rd 11 05:35 PM |
Thermal Forcasting -Thermal index | gldrgidr | Soaring | 6 | November 27th 10 10:26 PM |
Thermal Data Files Thermal Mapping Project Australia | Mal | Soaring | 0 | December 2nd 05 11:14 PM |