![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 23:54 23 October 2016, Jonathan St. Cloud wrote:
Just curious if there is research that compares blow holes versus tabulator tape as to effectiveness and drag? i.e., are the bow holes worth the maintenance or is tape effectively just as good? Does the new Ventus have tape or blow holes? That subject goes back over 30 years. As I recall, the blowholes would be better performance-wise if they could be regulated to blow really strongly at low speeds, and then blow only a little at higher speeds. To do this, one needs a large inlet to supply enough air to the ducts at thermalling speeds. Then, you have to shut that supply down to a trickle when cruising at higher speeds. This goes backwards to just having a fixed size inlet that is not adjustable in flight. One would have to have an extendable scoop on each wing that the pilot could extend and retract depending on airspeed to achieve this. Anyway, the Z-tape works pretty well, is cheap to install, and is easy to maintain. The blowholes are labor intensive both in construction ($) and in maintenance. I had DG-300 serial number 2, which was one of the first gliders with this technology. Back in 1983-1985, I did side by side comparison tests with the blowhole system working on the regular fixed size inlets. Then, I repeated the (side by side) tests with the inlets removed (to nullify the blowholes), and used Z-tape for the turbulation instead. I could not see any measurable performance difference between blowholes (with fixed size inlet) and Z-tape. There were arguments about the Standard Class rules to the point that there would have been protests filed if I had come up with and used a variable inlet scoop, so I left it alone. So, long story short. The Z-tape is a lot cheaper and easier, and yields good results. If you are in a class which would allow inlet size adjustment in flight, and you have lots of money to pay for the installation, and lots of time to spend maintaining all of of those tiny holes, then you might see a marginal improvement over Z-tape. That's how I remember it, although it was a long time ago, and the blowhole technology may have gotten better.....FWIW RO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another Blow to Airbus | a[_3_] | Piloting | 52 | August 19th 10 10:49 AM |
To blow or not to blow... | Dallas | Piloting | 50 | February 15th 08 12:57 PM |
oil blow out IO-360 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 18 | July 17th 06 04:44 PM |
oil blow out IO-360 | Robert M. Gary | Owning | 18 | July 17th 06 04:44 PM |
When Poorboys drill holes ...was: Drilling holes in steel tubing | wright1902glider | Home Built | 4 | November 4th 05 01:19 AM |