A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pre-Preg



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old December 6th 16, 07:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Fraser Wilson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Pre-Preg

Three further points with pre preg;-
1-Uni directional (UD) pre-preg, which is extensively used in wings, is
difficult
to form into compound curves;- it wrinkles
2-stray fibres, with pre-preg stray fibres can puncture the vac bag. The
wing
skins don't come out of the moulds until after the wings have been fully
glued
together. It's a bad day to discover a single stray fibre has killed the
vacuum
during the cure of a skin and you've just glued it to a good
spar/skin/installed
controls etc
3 - wet lay up wings post cure at 60C, normally out of mould. Pre-Preg
cures
at least 80C maybe hotter but this must be done in the mould. This means
the part and mould thermal expansion must be closely matched and the
longer the part , the more compound curves, the more difficult this
becomes.

Dry fibre resin infusion probably offers the best way forward as it can
provide
similar fibre fractions to pre preg but without the above and earlier
mention
drawbacks.

Fraser

At 21:58 05 December 2016, Casey wrote:
On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 2:23:59 PM UTC-5, Jonathan St. Cloud

wrote:
For the guys with an engine weight does make a difference. Imagine if

th=
e 100 pounds of engine and fuel were offset by construction methods that
lo=
wered the empty weight of the glider by even 50-70 pounds. YOu would
funct=
ionally have the same wing loading range as a pure glider.
=20
Just saying.
On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 4:09:14 PM UTC-8,


=
wrote:
4 Pretty much nobody cares much about weight, except the little

gliders=
.. For all the rest we just want to know how much water can we get in it.

Different building methods in same factory brings several issues I could
th=
ink of.
Cost of buying and storing different materials, cost of process, possible
m=
istakes in manufacturing, return on investment, different flying
characteri=
stics. Just throwing this out there.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.