For Keith Willshaw...

the claims about the war warning message text, dropped after the
war warning text was actually posted. (the warnings are supposed to

Dropped in your dreams maybe?
Ok.Lets repeat events again
a)Yamamatos "target Pearl Harbor" message intercepted and decoded by US and
Brits on Nov.25 and by Dutch on Nov.27.

b)After intercepting and decoding "Target Pearl Harbor" mesage on Nov.25,US
issued so-called War Warning message on Nov.26 for locations thousands miles
away from Pearl Harbor,BUT NOT for Pearl Harbor,the name of target mentioned in
Yamamatos dispatch !!!!.)
(BTW the Naval Court of Inquiry that exonorated Kimmel found that so called War
Message directed attention away from Hawaii rather than toward to it and
exonarated Kimmel)

2)After receiving Yamamato's "Target Pearl Harbor" message US did not only try
to direct attention AWAY from Pearl Harbor by issuing so called War Warning,but
also ordered ALL allied shipping to take Southern course,creating a shipping
free sea lane for the passage of Japanase Task Force!.

2) the use of the character in the Pearl Harbor movie played by Dan
Aykroyd as a source of facts, dropped when it was revealed where
the name came from.

Do you need the facts?
I can give you more than you bargained for,for example check out:
FOIA#F-1998-00977

3) claims about the various investigations into the Pearl Harbor attack,
dropped when a list of such investigations was posted

Posted with Auto poster ?

4) attempts to promote the relatively recent congressional request to
promote General Short and Admiral Kimmel as proof of a conspiracy
are dropped, after the text of the resolution is posted.

Posted with Autoposter?

1) the claim the "McCollum Memo" was a blueprint for US government
actions, dropped after the memo summary was posted, pointing out
what the memo actually said.

You have outright lied here the famed McCollum memo IS the blueprint for FDRs
Japan policy and the date of McCollum memo is Oct.7,1940,so not after Pearl
Harbor like you have claimed.

Apparently you have run out of arguments to prove your case.

Heck I expected much better than that from you initially.