![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ...
"Eunometic" wrote in message ... snip more of Arndt's unsupported fantasies The reason for the 'bouncing bomb' was surely that it was the ony way that a large charge could be placed accurately. There are at least half a dozen different guidence methods in service in various types of missile that can achieve 1 meter accuracy. Maverick, Martel, the old Condor, Raptor, SLAMER differential GPS, TV with or without man in the loop etc. All that is needed is to 'super size' them. An extraction of a MOAB sized weapon from a C130 being one option. A C-130 penetrating 1400 miles of PRC airspace and delivering a MOAB, huh? Get a grip. And doesn't "differential GPS" require both quite a bit of time and some post-processing? The MOAB launch vehicle and system is what is interesting. Taiwan I expect does have C130s and this suggests that extracting a 10 ton missile by parachute from a cargo plane is possible. Perhaps 20 tons is possible from a C130? MOAB is a freefall device. I would envisage a missile more akin to either skybolt or blue steel to give the necessary standoff capabillity. And doesn't "differential GPS" require both quite a bit of time and some post-processing It only needs to update and calibrate an inertial platform. One advanced version of SCUD has a TV guidence system to reduce the accruacy to well below 50 meters. (Using a trident missile for this sort of business with a penetrating warhead is another option) Taiwan has neither Scuds not Tridents. Scud lacks enough of a warhead, too. In WW2 apart from the fact that the carrier aircraft were impossibly vulnerable And a C-130 lumbering through PLA and PLAAF defended territory would not be?! Yes, well rather a lot of standoff capability would be needed. Brooks the Germans could have carried out such attacks with Fritz-X from around 1943 onwards and the Americans with AZON/RAZON. The Kehl-Strassbourg guidence system was compromised after the capture of some missiles in Italy but variations of the guidence system to restore immunity were also possible and plans existed to use the missile on the 2 seat 4 engined version of the Arado 234C jet bomber and thus the Germans would have had a delivery vehicle for such a weapon.. The Fritz-X was a little small: being half the mass of highball. AZON's main use seems to have been attacks against railway lines in the far east in a role it was highly effective. (23% hit rate). This CLOS type of guidence could have placed a bomb behined a damwall. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 31st 04 03:55 AM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
27 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | November 30th 03 05:57 PM |
11 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 11th 03 11:58 PM |
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 03:47 AM |