![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is an engine in the U.S. patent offices (so nobody can use it)
developed by 'Smokey' who wrote a self help column in Popular Science magazine for years, that doesn't use a radiator. It takes the heat from the engine and uses it to preheat the fuel to pre detonation temperature and thus allows 55% of fuel energy to be used rather than the 12% now used in conventional engines. You should look into this. I became aware of it a few months ago. It can be found in the 1980 or 1984 issues. Jay wrote: I'd like to see some discussion on surface radiators instead of how to build plenums directing air through auto radiators. Seems like you could braze aluminum tubing onto the inner surface of the lower cowl, add a sheet of insulation on top of that on the inside and you'd have a particularly low drag radiator. The cowling is going to get blasted with turbulant air anyway, might as well heat that air up a little as it swirls by the surface. The holes in the front of the cowling make some sense for an air cooled engine where the temperature differential is high and you can direct some air (with lots of drag) directly onto the heads. But if you have a water cooled engine, you can do things differently and it would seem with lower drag. Drag is the primary predictor of top speed, beyond horsepower even. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|