![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ford Prefect" wrote in message ... Charles Talleyrand wrote: Radar is a problem. Web searches make me believe that Canada only builds radars for atmospheric research and air traffic control and one military radar, which is used by maritime aircraft for periscope searching. Given that our radar satellite systems make the US nervous (didn't we have to agree to reduce resolution on RadarSat during US fly-overs?), I think we can manage this without much trouble. McDonald-Detwiller certainly has the talent to do this... and the folks at several other firms which do international military contracts certainly have additional talent that could be tapped. And the detection systems used on the Cougar (correct designation?) certainly attest to the ability to develop very sophisticated detection and tracking capabilities. I think the antenna for the radar for RADARSAT-2 was built by a Canadian company named EMS. I think they used their Atlanta office for this though. Even so, they must have some clue in their two Canadian offices (they have three main engineering offices total). It's the right type of antenna (light weight planar array) http://www.space.gc.ca/asc/eng/csa_s...2/inf_over.asp http://www.emsstg.com/ McDermitt and company only manage and sell the data. Missiles are another problem. Web searches suggest that Canada builds no missiles and more importantly no seaker heads. They might have to start from scratch on this. Common technology --- most countries purchase these from others. And reverse engineering the missles already in inventory isn;t such a hard thing to do. Simple web searches would give all the technology, or one could start with the basics as published in Smithsonian Air & Space a while back... Maybe. I'm sure eventually Canada could do this from first prinipals if need be. I was hoping for an example of Canadian success in the field. I am curious as to why you base your assumptions on the results of "web searches". Nor all companies are so stupid as to place classified, sensitive, or advanced information on the web -- Canadian companies don't tend to use the web to hype their military knowledge as those of some other nations do. Just because it is not on the web doesn't mean it doesn't exist! As the SETI folks are fond of saying: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!". That's true. But I'm not looking for classified information. However, most companies put up web pages and issue press releases when they win major contracts or make sigificant technological accomplishments. It's absolutley no secret who makes the F/A-18 radar even if some specific techniques are classified. Besides, I don't have a pile of industry pundits camped out in my living room to ask. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAATECH FUEL SYSTEMS SEMINAR JULY 10TH - MIDLAND, Ontario, Canada | Robert Schieck | Home Built | 0 | June 30th 04 08:28 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 06:48 PM |
Reflections on first trip to Canada from US | Mike & Janet Larke | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 9th 03 12:57 AM |
[Fwd: Why I'll never build a kit plane.] | Corky Scott | Home Built | 16 | July 28th 03 01:56 AM |