![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 03:05 22 May 2017, Steve Leonard wrote:
On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 5:40:06 PM UTC-5, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Sun, 21 May 2017 13:39:31 -0700, Bruce Hoult wrote: =20 When someone says "the first Cirrus was essentially a glass SHK, the prototype inherited the V-tail, the production versions went over to th= e conventional tail-plane and elevator" I tend to the assumption they're talking about "early" ones -- which are the vast majority of examples i= n NZ. =20 Understood: apparently only the first prototype had a V-tail, so I'd=20 expect the "early" Cirruses in NZ to be T-tailed with all flying tails.= =20 =20 I also know that the first production Std Cirrii had 1.5 degrees washout= =20 on the wing and were a bit prone to tip stalling and spinning. Later Std= =20 Cirrii had 3 degrees of washout which, apparently cost them some=20 performance but killed the tip stalling tendency, but I have no idea what= =20 Wrk.Nr this change applied to. It would be interesting to know which=20 group most NZ-registered Std Cirri fall in. =20 I've heard it said that Std Cirri dominated Club Class until the ones=20 with 1.5 degrees of washout had all been broken and that after that Std= =20 Libelles took over. Make what you will of that! =20 =20 =20 --=20 martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | What Scott said, and then some. Martin, I think you have confused the Cirr= us (17.74 meter) with the Std Cirrus (15 meter). Also,to imply the Cirrus is "basically a fiberglass SHK" is comparable to s= aying "the Corvette is just a fiberglass body on a Monte Carlo." Two ENTIR= ELY different sailplanes. The ONLY similarity is that the prototype Cirrus= had an SHK tail on it. Different wing span, airfoil sections and aspect r= atios. different cockpit layout and geometry. They came from the same man= ufacturer, but other than that... Just my 2 cents worth, Steve Leonard Steve is entirely correct. The SHK was derived from the HKS-3 which was designed by Haase, Kensche, and Schemmp. E.G. Haase flew and won the WGC in 1958 (Poland) with it. It used wing warping as opposed to ailerons for increased performance. The HKS design was modified for series production as the SHK. Later, when Klaus Holighaus came to S-H straight out of Akaflieg Darmstadt, he brought along design/constuction ideas and concepts that he had learned and used (along with Waibel and Lemke) when they built the D-36 at the university. The Open Cirrus was Klaus' first venture as the new owner and glider designer of S-H. It is a totally different glider than the SHK. RO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone flown atn LPV yet? | Sam Spade | Instrument Flight Rules | 40 | January 13th 07 10:28 AM |
Has anyone flown in here? | john smith | Piloting | 2 | October 2nd 05 11:36 AM |
has anyone flown with these ? | Damian John Paul Brown | Rotorcraft | 4 | April 16th 04 09:48 PM |
has anyone flown with these ? | Damian John Paul Brown | General Aviation | 0 | April 15th 04 04:26 AM |
has anyone flown with these ? | Damian John Paul Brown | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | April 15th 04 04:25 AM |