![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with Evan.
But why not get the guys at LXNav, Naviter, LXNavigation, to call it arrival "height" and reserve "height" if you must have it? Which imho is what it is displayed, and this more precise terminology might remove at least one source of confusion. While you're at it, Waypoints have Elevation, perhaps. At 14:08 26 May 2017, Tango Eight wrote: On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 8:46:28 AM UTC-4, MNLou wrote: Hi Evan -=20 =20 Would you please expand a bit on why you think it is better to set reserv= e altitude to zero? =20 Thanks! =20 Lou Uh, sure. This is a semi-religious issue, so opinions will vary. Here's m= y $0.02 on a rainy day: Conditions vary. Airport environments vary. I happen to fly in a region o= f the world (Northern New England) that features a lot of terrain that runs= between poorly landable and completely unlandable, and weather than runs f= rom benign to a crash-waiting-to-happen. While my environment is more chal= lenging than many, yours isn't uniform, either. So, the basic point is: there is no one standard reserve height that is app= ropriate in all situations. You as PIC need to be making decisions based o= n environment, current conditions & anything else that affects safety of fl= ight. The computer is your assistant, not your decision maker. For example: At my home airport (also DC's home airport) our traffic patter= n is high due to surrounding terrain and your final glide ought to be padde= d well beyond this because there is simply no safe place to land other than= the airport for a radius of about 5 miles (and then only one or two places= , not necessarily where you want them!). Furthermore, the "safe" (that is,= landable) route into my home airport follows a river valley which often fe= atures a) valley winds and b) subsiding air. I'm usually looking for 1500'= over an MC 2.0 (kts) final glide from 25 out, based on the airport elevati= on. When I was learning to fly XC here, it was more like 2000 over.=20 This is total overkill at a million flat lands airports.=20 The obvious, simple solution is to set your flight computer to report estim= ated arrival height at any destination without any reserve, then do the PIC= decision making thing. For old Cambridge gear, that's trivial. For Clear= Nav, there's one gotcha involved (easily handled, set the purple amoeba to = zero and the red one to 1000 agl), for SN-10, you have to build yourself a = whole new database with fake-news airport elevations (yes, people really do= this, I've watched). Go fast, make good decisions, land safe! best, Evan Ludeman / T8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good News on Delorme InReach (2 min tracking and altitude vs. Spot w/10 min tracking and no altitude) | Sean F (F2) | Soaring | 34 | February 24th 13 12:46 AM |
Vector altitude for ILS below GS intercept altitude? | M | Instrument Flight Rules | 23 | May 20th 06 07:41 PM |
GPS altitude vs altimeter altitude | Chris W | Piloting | 37 | April 19th 06 10:45 AM |
Pressure Altitude or Density Altitude | john smith | Piloting | 3 | July 22nd 04 10:48 AM |
FA: New ASA IP Trainer V6.5 IFR - no reserve | Scaggs Island Pilots Supplies | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 26th 03 03:07 AM |