![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denyav" wrote in message ... What HM gov't would do if they received a specific terror warning for London? 1)Issue a terror alert for London 2)Issue terror alerts for Montevideo,Montreal,Athens and Cairo,but not for London. Which one would be the correct response? None of the above, they would issue the orders necessary to counter the threat, as has been done many times Nice way of dodging some questions. Nope its an accurate answer A view that was overturned by every subsequent inquiry and was self serving, their major interest was proving that it wasnt the fault of the USN. Only twice Kimmel and/or his kin were given opportunity to present their their case and evidences,in Naval court of Inquiry and in 90s during Congressional mini probe,and both panels,what a surprise,concluded that Kimmel should be exonarated. Horsefeathers, there were MANY inquiries and Kimmel testified during many of them and the 1946 congressional inquiry contains the following paragraph "All parties in interest have attested to the fact that they have been afforded a full, fair, and impartial public hearing before the committee. All witnesses who retained counsel-Admiral Stark, Admiral Kimmel, and General Short-were given the opportunity to be examined by their counsel if they so desired, and to submit questions to committee counsel to be asked other witnesses." Irrelevant This word seems to be the most frequenly used word by the custodians of Pearl Harbor conspiracy when they face hard evidence. Which is inevitable when irrelevant issues are raised. BRITISH Government was unwilling to declassify material relevant to the Pearl Harbor intelligence issue because it was subject to the UK-USA Intelligence Agreement, they made no complaint about US files being withheld I was referring to Crane files not British files.Sen.Thurman and Rep.Sprnce were denied access to these files in 90s. And yet Stinnet claims that they are in the bnational archive http://www.independent.org/tii/news/021202Stinnett.html In other words Mr.Willshaw,representatives of American people investigating Pearl Harbor incident were denied access to almost 60 year old files. They stated not Trouble is the 12 subsequent inquiries, including the extremely through 1946 congressional investigation ALL overthrew that result. Kimmel just made too many mistakes. Actualy Army Board of investigation report was much more damaging for FDR-Stimson-Marshall trio than Navy version. Hardly Marshall offered his resignation after Army report. Arndt started this thread and made a capital mistake by implying that UK has become a banana republic of US. US was a banana republic for UK in 1941 also US was a UKs banana republic in 2001. No bananas here bwana, note the last thing Britain wanted in 1941 was war with Japan, it diverted massive resources away from the war in Europe at a time when the Nazis were only 150 miles away from London and the U-Boats were sinling our merchant marine at an unsustainable rate. Lord Rhodas' ideas sometimes realized by using Rhodas scholars. sometimes by using shock and awe methods. That's Rhodes old boy, do try and get the name right and he used cold hard cash to achieve his ends, war wasnt profitable. Heck,everbody is trying to find a Straussian (Neocon),Jewish,Israeli or Southern Baptist connection in 21st century version of PH,but nobody is looking for an Anglo connection. As I said before,I admire British great gaming skills. There arent too many southern baptists in London old son. Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Videos: Su-37 Superflanker vs F-22 Raptor | Alejandro Magno | Military Aviation | 20 | January 10th 04 05:19 PM |