![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a simple in flight test used with RC gliders.
Some of which are getting to be quite big these days and a subsection of which fly faster than 500 mph (up hill, into wind, that was measured at) So, probably, has some application in our sport. Fly at whatever speed you are normally trimmed at and put the glider into a dive (not particularly steep, say 30 deg nose down) and let the glider do what it wants from there. (staying below Va or Vne depending on conditions) If the glider stays at that angle an RC glider has it's CofG perfect (for us that means our CofG is a bit too far back as we need more stability in pitch than the RC gliders) If the glider pitches down and increases the dive, your CofG is too far back (flying surfaces are keeping the nose down and their effect becomes more pronounced as speed builds) If the glider recovers back to flat n level then the CofG on ours is about right, on an RC glider it's a bit too far forward. The other check to make before you do this: note where your trimmer is in normal flight, after landing put the trimmer back there and look at the elevator. Ideally, when your CofG is right, your elevator should be in line with the horizontal stab at "Normal" trim (it probably isn't as your CofG will be a bit forward to give the glider longitudinal stability) So, the RC glider test will show where your inflight CofG is (note, your center of pressure will move relative to your CofG depending on speed) Modern gliders are designed to be stable. Older gliders too (but usually not so well) A slightly forward CofG gives you stability A very forward CofG gives you lots of drag. A rearward CofG gives your wife hope for the next husband to be better . |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
302 wind calculation | 5Z | Soaring | 1 | March 26th 10 11:56 AM |
302 wind calculation | AK | Soaring | 0 | March 26th 10 02:47 AM |
flight computer calculation | Tim | General Aviation | 1 | April 26th 05 10:40 AM |
Three leg GS to TAS calculation | Mike Rapoport | Owning | 21 | September 12th 04 04:37 AM |
The "Complex" TAS calculation | Arnold Pieper | Soaring | 2 | December 14th 03 12:22 PM |