![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message om... Show your evidence that Kerry didnt earn his third purple heart, received in his second tour of duty. I didn't say it was his third purple heart, I said he used an unearned purple heart to get out of Vietnam after serving just a third of his tour. I believe the award in question was the first one. The following letter appeared in the USA Today "Letters" section on June 25th last, page 8A: Criticism of Kerry's Purple Heart is just Retired U.S. army colonel David Hackworth defends presidential candidate John Kerry's Purple Hearts. He correctly notes that they are awarded for a wound that necessitates treatment by a medical officer and that is received in action with an enemy ('The meaning of a Purple Heart," The Forum, June 16). I was the commanding officer to whom Kerry reported his injury on Dec. 3, 1968. I had confirmed that there was no hostile fire that night and that Kerry had simply wounded himself with an M-79 grenade round he fired too close. He wanted a Purple Heart, and I refused. Louis Letson, the base physician, saw Kerry and used tweezers to remove the tiny piece of shrapnel - about 1 centi*meter in length and 2 millimeters in di*ameter. Letson also confirmed that the scratch was inflicted with our M-79. We admire Col. Hackworth, but he, above all people, knows why it is unac*ceptable to nominate yourself for an award. It compromises the basic military principle that we survive together. To promote yourself is to denigrate your team. I hope Col. Hackworth will rethink his characterization of Kerry's swift-boat comrades as "grousers" passing on "secondhand bilge." In our case, this is firsthand knowledge, and our integrity is unquestioned. Kerry orchestrated his way out of Viet*nam and then testified, under oath, be*fore Congress that we, his comrades, had committed horrible war crimes. This tes*timony was a lie and slandered honor*able men. We, who were actually there, believe he is unfit to command our sons and daughters. Grant Hibbard, retired commander US. Navy, Gulf Breeze, Fla. Louis Letson, M.D. Retired lieutenant commander Medical Corps, US. Navy Reserve Scottsboro, Ala. ALso, Show your evidence that Bush didn't get out of Vietnam. Evidence that Bush didn't get out of Vietnam? What the hell are you talking about? Bush did not serve in Vietnam. Show why any of that is more important than what both men have done since. I can't. I don't believe it is more important than what both men have done since. But Kerry and the Democratic Party apparently do believe it is more important than what they have done since. Since Kerry became the frontrunner for their nomination Vietnam has been the key issue in their campaign to defeat Bush. Note that Vietnam was not an issue when Howard Dean, who spent much of the Vietnam war with a medical deferment for a bad back but still managed to become a rather accomplished skier, was their frontrunner. Kerry's position on Vietnam has changed dramatically since early 1992, when Bill Clinton, who avoided not just Vietnam but the military entirely, was campaigning for the Democratic nomination for president: " I am saddened by the fact that Vietnam has yet again been inserted into the campaign, and that it has been inserted in what I feel to be the worst possible way. By that I mean that yesterday, during this Presidential campaign, and even throughout recent times, Vietnam has been discussed and written about without an adequate statement of its full meaning." "We do not need to divide America over who served and how. I have personally always believed that many served in many different ways. Someone who was deeply against the war in 1969 or 1970 may well have served their country with equal passion and patriotism by opposing the war as by fighting in it. Are we now, 20 years or 30 years later, to forget the difficulties of that time, of families that were literally torn apart, of brothers who ceased to talk to brothers, of fathers who disowned their sons, of people who felt compelled to leave the country and forget their own future and turn against the will of their own aspirations?" Senator John Kerry, Jan 30, 1992 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 31st 04 03:55 AM |
11 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 11th 03 11:58 PM |
04 Oct 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 4th 03 07:51 PM |
FS: Aviation History Books | Neil Cournoyer | Military Aviation | 0 | August 26th 03 08:32 PM |
07 Aug 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 8th 03 02:51 AM |