![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brett" wrote in message ... "tim gueguen" wrote in message news:kqzGc.969780$Pk3.439395@pd7tw1no... "Brett" wrote in message . .. "tim gueguen" wrote: "Bill & Susan Maddux" wrote in message om... The terrorist would like nothing better than perform an act of terror to change the out come of an American Election like they did in Spain. I believe that if Gore had won in 2000, 9-11 would have been deal with the same manor as the first Twin Towers attack in 93. (NOTHING). ********. The Embassy bombings in 1998 didn't generate much of a response from the Clinton Administration (remember Gore was part of it) Which was not a direct attack on United States territory, A US Embassy is considered US territory so it would be a direct attack. But not to Joe Q. Public, and certainly not the way an attack on New York is. didn't cause billions of dollars of damage to New York City and the Pentagon, and didn't kill 3000 plus US citizens in their own country. so your comment should be directed at you, since the Maddux comment is probably closer to the truth than yours. If you really think a Gore admin wouldn't have gone out and stomped on the Taliban A couple of cruise missiles directed at nearly empty training camps. They would have done a lot more than that. They would have had no choice given public opinion. as the Bush admin did you need to take those partisan blinders off. The person with the blinders on is you. Got it backwards. Looking at US foreign policy from the outside one doesn't see huge differences in behaviour between the 2 parties. tim gueguen 101867 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|