![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tiistai 3. lokakuuta 2017 14.57.45 UTC+3 Muttley kirjoitti:
On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 7:30:07 PM UTC+1, Paul T wrote: http://www.fai.org/igc-our-sport/handicaps So many misplaced handicaps its a joke. Whoever came up with this list was clearly smoking some illegal substance at the time. May be you should read this first http://static.skysight.io/hc.pdf Document on how they arrived at the changed Handicaps 1. Let's make a fancy computer software and calculate handicaps based on old crappy idaflieg measurements (304 vs. Mosquito!) and weather model. 2. Hmm... Computer generatend handicap spread is too large. Let's make it, shall we say, umm... 70% instead. 3. Done Very scientific. If you give a empty list of glider types to 100 competition pilots and ask them to individually write down their opionion of fair handicaps, you can create a averaged list that is fair to everyone (and you will be surprised how everyone will end up with same handicaps). Fair handicaps are actually quite obvious, no reason to use this kind of shoddy pseudoscience. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
April 5 | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 5 | April 7th 06 07:20 AM |
April 10 Update | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | April 8th 05 01:01 AM |
April 3 Update | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | April 1st 05 03:38 AM |
April 11 Update | DHeitm8612 | General Aviation | 0 | April 9th 04 04:22 AM |
April 4 Update | DHeitm8612 | General Aviation | 0 | April 2nd 04 06:04 AM |