![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Jackie Mulheron
writes In article , "Paul J. Adam" writes: Sure, but it means you get to pay for them (and most of the support and TacDev is way down south, Och I'm sure it won't be as bad as the constant Defence Reviews and reorganisations we have in the UK at the behest of the Treasury. It'll be worse for both sides. meaning you need to pay again to duplicate it if it's a hostile split). Balkanisation isn't usually a good idea (I mean, _look_ at the Balkans - would _you_ want to live there?) This isn't the Balkans. More sedate like the "splits" with Canada et al. 'Sedate'? The poster who got me into this argument was claiming that Scotland would get what it wanted or start throwing Tridents around. A peaceful, negotiated separation would mean significant loss of capability on both sides, but could be managed to minimise the pain. But the scenario presented was simple thuggery. The idea of a British Isles Balkans is just the fantasy hyperbole passing for unionist political propaganda. Why? Two elements of a 'former nation-state', one breaking away with significant expertise and strong will, another determined to crush this 'minority revolt' having most of the big guns (and please, consider something called the Permissive Action Link) It's a situation to be devoutly avoided. If Scotland really wants to break free, then I have strong reasons for both sides to sort the issue out peacefully. But it was not I that advanced the notion of "if we don't get what we want, we just nuke London". Most countries go their separate ways quite amicably. It's just that their stories don't make good movies. Quite so. And as the son of a mother from Aberdeen and a father from Perth, I'd devoutly hope that the separation would be as painless and efficient as possible. But that doesn't change the fact that some hard choices would have to be made and the negotiations would get downright "frank and forthright" at times.. Careful there - the US might remember the Auld Alliance and decide that Scotland is close enough to France to become part of the Axis of Evil. Trying to auction nuclear warheads might get some unwelcome gatecrashers (besides, most of the customers are short on manners, and might decide that it was easier to kill other bidders than match their price, then the auctioneer gets hit in the crossfire, and where's your profit then?) Be a tad dangerous hitting us in the crossfire when we still have the capability of delivering the goods for free. Deliver them to whom? Scotland doesn't have a DSP network or any BMEWS stations. You know for sure you just got hit, you have the mushroom clouds to prove it, but whose hand did the deed and where should you retaliate? For that matter, according to some you've just auctioned off some nuclear weapons to the highest bidder: how can you be sure they didn't just use you as a live-fire test of their new toys (and to avoid having the cheque cashed?) -- He thinks too much: such men are dangerous. Julius Caesar I:2 Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
Chinook: stalwart of armed forces air operations | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 08:14 PM |
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | December 7th 03 08:20 PM |
Cutting the UK armed forces | phil hunt | Military Aviation | 7 | October 25th 03 05:08 PM |
Gw Bush toy doll in flightgear - now available | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 100 | September 25th 03 12:13 PM |