![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Typhoon502
writes (ArtKramr) wrote in message ... It has nothing to do with any of that. The more missions you fly the worse the odds of survival. How commited you are is irrelevant. I think this is patently, demonstrably false. The more missions you fly, the more experience and maturity in the role you gain. And thus, the more likely you are to avoid making the mistake or error that can compromise your survival. To a point, but it depends on mission, role and threat. That's why veteran fighter pilots would regularly make mince out of rookies sent out to take them on. True, but how does an "experienced bomber pilot" holding formation in the box avoid barrage AAA? Can't change course or speed - you're in *formation*. What else can you do except hold on and hope? Tactical fighters (and ground combat troops, interestingly) have a well documented survivability curve, rising rapidly in the early stages as they learn to recognise and honour the threats (and according to some, dropping towards the end of fixed-length tours - combat fatigue or overconfidence? Don't know, but it's at least claimed) But those are combatants with - literally - a lot more room for manoeuvre. Flying formation bombing raids was rather more like Napoleonic infantry forming square under artillery fi each roundshot fired at the formation could kill or maim four or five men, and individual skill made no difference at all to the enemy gunners' point of aim and the flight of the shot. Experience improved your chances of coming back after damage, fending off fighter attack and avoiding loss by error (those weren't easy or forgiving aircraft) but did nothing to reduce the odds of an AA shell exploding within lethal distance of your aircraft. That's why you take your experienced soldier, sailors, Marines, and pilots and put them into training roles to impart some of that knowledge into the empty heads of their trainees, so that maybe the learning curve for the new ranks won't be as steep. Worth doing just about everywhere. And it's definitely a matter of commitment. A committed soldier or pilot learns more, trains harder, and works more to ensure the survival of the unit, and therefore himself. Also no argument. -- He thinks too much: such men are dangerous. Julius Caesar I:2 Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 196 | June 14th 04 11:33 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |