A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RIP Tomas Reich - SGP Chile



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28  
Old January 31st 18, 12:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Justin Craig[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default RIP Tomas Reich - SGP Chile

Thank you,

So sorry for your loss.


At 03:15 31 January 2018, wrote:
On Sunday, January 21, 2018 at 10:59:41 AM UTC-3, Paul Agnew wrote:
From Facebook:
=20
Sad news from the last race day;
Local Chile pilot Tomas Reich had an accident on the ridges south of

Sant=
iago. The Chile SAR recovered Tomas and took him by helicopter to the
hospi=
tal in Santiago. Unfortunately Tomas died during the evening from the
injur=
ies he sustained during the accident. Our thoughts and prayers are for

his
=
family and friends during this tragic time.

Hi to all,
I am one of the pilots that flew the GP in Chile and friend of Tomas, who
s=
adly died on last day of competition.=20

On training day, there was an accident during a final glide ridge soaring
b=
ack home (about 20 km) and at least +500 m above Vitacura as arrival. The
n=
ew and very complex OGN antenna system we made for the mountains, made it
p=
ossible to find him on time. Mountain ridge slope was not as very high
moun=
tain side, where we have never had an accident in 70 years (since the
origi=
ns of our gliding activity in Chile). Probably we need to analyse and
filte=
r pilot=C2=B4s personal accident record to start with. No rule, no task,
no=
weather, no risk involved on that manouver explained the
accident...howeve=
r it happened. Why?.

On last competition day, we had a terrible fatal accident that is under
ana=
lysis of course, but the terrain where it happened is not the high and
"ter=
rible mountains" as some pilots are trying to define for this country. An
8=
00 meters airfield at 4 Km distance and +1100 meters altitude as arrival.
W=
hy it happened???. That is the question we need to answer but probably
will=
never know. We can guess only and cry in the process.

We know racing has a risk. We need to be responsible in managing the

risk:
=
rules, tasks, safety devices, etc., but we will never be in the pilots
head=
, who finally manages all the factors.

On Varesse GP Final there were big complains from a very well known pilot
b=
ecause minimum arrival altitude rule was too accurate without margin. IGC
c=
reated a 5 m buffer. In Chile same pilot arrived 2 meters bellow the new
bu=
ffer altitude (7 meters) and wanted to make a protest for 2 meters. Why
pu=
shing hard?. Pilots know they have those 5 meters in the pocket and want
mo=
re. It is the same in all IGC rules...there is always a downside from the
p=
ilots.
=20
On Varesse GP Final a pilot complained about wing load limit of 52 kg/m2
im=
posed for two reasons: to equal glider performance and to improve glider
ma=
neuverability. He wanted IGC to erase this "stupid rule" and to free the
wi=
ng loading in order to make ASG 29 more competitive against JS1. Flying
com=
petition in mountains with 56 or 57 kg/m2 is even more dangerous!!!, not
52=
.. Now in Chile he says this is the most dangerous competition?.

We have to be responsible with our declarations and the consequences,
speci=
ally taking the opportunity to blame organizers just when a fatal

accident
=
happened. It is not fare for Tomas, and the gliding community he will
alway=
s be part of.

One pilot here mentioned to check Kawa=C2=B4s flights but those in Chile.
I=
t is not fare for us and it is an insult for all mountain pilots with
thous=
ands of hours and in any other mountain like Alps, Pyrenees, etc. He

flies
=
in Chile with the same risk than any other competition pilot during the
GP.=
None of the other 18 pilots flew with more risk than him. He knows how

to
=
fly better the thermals, the final glide is better, he is just better
menta=
lly and that is why he won.
Kawa said in his book that flying in Chile was boring (back in 2010), but
f=
ew days ago he told me that he wants to take that back after a flight we
ha=
d together and found to be the most fun and exciting flight he had.

Now I am not only sad for our loss, but for the way our Country and the
off=
icials have been treated in a famous interview at opensoaring.

Chile is one of the best places for GP competitions.

Have a nice flights and hope you all can fly our beautiful Volcanoes,
glaci=
ers, lakes and multicolor mountains one day.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter pics 1 [03/11] - DeHavilland-Canada-DHC-6-100-Twin-Otter-Chile-Air-Force-Fuerza-Aerea-De-Chile-Twin-Engine-Airplane-Aircraft-940.jpg (1/1) Miloch Aviation Photos 0 September 30th 17 03:10 PM
Any news from Chile Bob Gibbons[_2_] Soaring 3 March 2nd 10 04:08 PM
Soaring in Chile [email protected] Soaring 3 February 21st 09 11:43 PM
The GP in Chile cernauta Soaring 0 January 7th 09 12:51 AM
Reich Weapons in Australia robert arndt Military Aviation 0 January 3rd 04 04:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.