![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 18:17 14 February 2018, AS wrote:
Kevin - you got it! There is nothing wrong with the TwinII or the K21 except most TwinIIs in the US are essentially single seat gliders with a large luggage compartment due to multiple repairs while the K21s are few and far between and when one comes up for sale, it still costs a fortune. We need an affordable, well performing fiberglass trainer that prepares future pilots for the V3, D3, etc. Uli 'AS' ----------------------------------------------------- That's why my brother and I have been importing Twin 1's. -They can still be had for a reasonable cost. -Handling is improved if one puts STC approved Z-Tape in front of the control surfaces. -L/D = 38/1 - better than Twin II or ASK-21, and qualifies with insurance companies for pilots wanting to fly higher performance gliders. 38/1 is the cut-off, so Twin II and ASK-21 don't qualify. Twin 1 actually climbs better too, as it can comfortably fly slower than the Twin II. - payload of 506 Lbs (NDH of course) allows for 66 Lbs of damage repairs before one ever even gets down to the 440 Lbs NEW NDH payload of a Twin II !! -12,000 hour service life compared to 5-6K hours on Blaniks. (and then go try and get any kind of factory support for a Blanik in the USA - good luck...) _LTB Lindner in Germany has taken over all Grob glider patents, rights, molds, dies, spare parts, STC, etc. They provide pretty much "factory" service. If they don't have a spare part on hand, they can make one, so there is good service support available. -The Twin 1's were to a large extent the "DUO" discus of their day. Most training was done in Ka-7's and ASK-13's. The Twin 1's were often "sacred cows" which only the best pilots got to fly on XC training, etc. So, percentage wise, Twin 1's generally have been more pampered and less damaged than the Twin II's which were put right into the training routine with accompanying breakage. Yes, ground handling is harder due to the tail dolly, etc. Yes, the back seat has the gear well protruding into the seat area which takes some arranging of cushions in order to get comfortable. Yes, the controls are a little stiff, (commensurate with a 1970's era 17m glider) but can be made noticeably more effective with the use of Z-Tape But for us, the positives far outweigh the negatives, and our club has found that this is a solution which we can live with comfortably. We currently operate between 2 and 3 Twin 1's at any given time. Every time we think of an ASK-21, or DUO, we come back to saying that we can have 2-3 Twin 1's for the price of one of those newer gliders. RO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any news from this exciting design? | TRKA | Soaring | 9 | January 4th 11 02:17 PM |
out of focus can sometimes be exciting too | Pensacola Beachcomber | Aviation Photos | 3 | May 5th 08 03:27 PM |
Read an exciting, intelectual Novel after flight? | The Masconi's a Novel | Owning | 0 | May 4th 06 07:19 PM |
How come military aviation is so exciting....? | Garamondextended | Military Aviation | 1 | May 13th 04 03:49 PM |
EXCITING NEW POSSIBILITIES | John Roake | Soaring | 0 | December 9th 03 12:59 AM |