A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old July 17th 04, 07:32 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WalterM140" wrote in message
...
Probably because its untrue

The simple fact is that during March 1944 bomber command flew a total
of 9031 sorties with a loss rate of under 4%. Nuremburg was indeed a
disaster
but an isolated one.

The RAF definitely was defeated over Germany by the Luftwaffe in the

Spring of
1944. Being put onto invasion targets has obscured this fact.

"Bomber Command had lost 4,160 aircraft missing and crashed in England.
Harris's failure to bring Germany to her knees, and the cost of his

failure,
had become embarrassingly evident to every man but himself.


Bull**** - losses in the first 4 months of 1944 were as follows

Month Lost Crashed %Loss
January 314 38 5.6
Febuary 199 21 5.2
March 283 39 3.6
April 214 25 2.4


During this period the B-17's of US 8th AF were suffering very
similar loss rates.


So what? What has that got to do with the RAF?


It shows the RAF were doing no worse than the USAF

And during the first 4 months of 1944, the USAAF was seriously attriting

the
Luftwaffe. The RAF was not. The Spitfires didn't have the range to help

out
over Germany. That's where the Luftwaffe was.





And in a letter to
the Air Ministry on April 7, 1944, he came as close as ever in his life

to
conceding that he was in deep trouble:

'The strength of the German defenses [he wrote] would in time reach a

point at
which night-bombing attacks by existing methods and types of heavy

bombers
would involve percentage casualty rates which in the long run could not

be
sustained...we have not yet reached that point, but tactical

innovations
which
have so far postponed it are now practically exhausted....'


So in fact in the spring of 1944 he is saying he has NOT been defeated,


Harris was in denial. As Hastings points out, he was the only one not

saying
that.

If you watch the World At War episode, "Whirlwind", you'll hear Harris say

that
the Battle of Berlin was not a defeat. But it was, and a bad one.


The Battle of Berlin was indeed a defeat, that was not the
entirety of the air war over Germany however and its provably
untrue to claim that ai operations over Germany were suspended.

Keith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
regaining night currency but not alone Teacherjh Instrument Flight Rules 11 May 28th 04 02:08 PM
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? Matthew G. Saroff Military Aviation 111 May 4th 04 05:34 PM
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 Jukka O. Kauppinen Military Aviation 4 March 22nd 04 11:19 PM
Why did Britain win the BoB? Grantland Military Aviation 79 October 15th 03 03:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.