![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Jul 2018 08:54:40 -0700, chip.bearden wrote:
Based on my and other reported experiences, I think the best system is whatever you are comfortable with and is reliable. I've seen problems reported with a variety of hardware and software. I'm in the IT business and it's amazing to me that this stuff works as well as it does given the low volumes, whether it's commercial products like ClearNav or freeware such as Top Hat/XCSoar. I was also in the IT business, now retired. I think a major reason this stuff works as well as it does is that the developers are (all?) also active users of this stuff. That is not knocking professional developers, just pointing out that they are seldom active users of what they write and IMO this factor makes a huge difference, especially to usability and GUI design. I flew with XCSoar for a few years, but switched to LK8000 whe nit appeared because I prefer its user interface, which took less effort to set up the way I want it that XCSoar did, and on a good day with no weather or airspace issues to force changes of plan I won't touch it from launch to landing. I've looked at SYM but prefer LK8000. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
XCSoar Question | Dan Marotta | Soaring | 9 | June 16th 16 02:58 PM |
CAI-302 and XCSoar | Dan Marotta | Soaring | 7 | March 29th 12 09:55 PM |
XCsoar 6.2.6 Question | Karl Kunz | Soaring | 8 | March 16th 12 04:12 PM |
xcsoar | [email protected] | Soaring | 40 | August 13th 09 09:01 PM |
XCSoar | jorgie | Soaring | 2 | November 2nd 04 12:05 AM |