![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:21:03 -0700, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Thursday, August 23, 2018 at 5:55:25 PM UTC-7, wrote: While it's spectacular to set altitude records, the real importance of this project is making steps toward stratospheric research in a vehicle that will not contaminate the nearby atmosphere with noise: chemical, mechanical, aerodynamic. This is not a toy and its mission is not play. On that basis, wouldn't you be much better off doing your oh-so-serious research with a UAV? Possible/probable reasons why Perlan 2 is the best choice: - Perlan 2 already exists. - There are no electric UAVs with a similar flight envelope. - Any powered replacement has to be electric to avoid atmospheric exhaust contamination. - Even an electric UAV will add unwanted disturbances with its prop wake. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Perlan GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft | Tom Kelley #711 | Soaring | 15 | September 5th 17 03:54 PM |
Perlan flying GLIDER ALTITUDE: 51134 ft | Tom Kelley #711 | Soaring | 2 | September 3rd 17 06:21 PM |
Martin B-57 Canberra pics [19/20] - NASA High Altitude Plane.jpg (1/1) | Miloch | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 26th 16 12:34 AM |
Perlan project - high wave flights | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 2 | October 20th 05 01:15 AM |
High Altitude simulator accuracy in X-Plane | Ghazan Haider | Simulators | 2 | August 16th 05 06:01 PM |