A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cheaper tows?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old October 17th 18, 02:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 463
Default Cheaper tows?

On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 3:14:01 PM UTC-5, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:
To sorta answer this, there is an ongoing push by AOPA and other groups along with the FAA (in the US) for a suitable unleaded fuel for use in the older "leaded fuel" engines.
I know we added a supplement to our low lead fuel for our towplanes. Don't remember the name of it.

As to using auto derived engines for aircraft duty, sheesh, other than endurance racing (likely max runtime until rebuild, maybe 25hrs?), auto engines were not designed to run near full power for about 2000hrs before rebuild.
While most piston aircraft engine are rather archaic compared to modern auto engines, they are rather dirt simple and last for a long time at high power loads.
Yes, a better ignition system can help, although try getting that certified.
Yes, in the US, and other countries, there is a push to find a suitable unleaded fuel.
Aviation is still a small niche market (a bit larger than sailplanes, but still small for Shell, BP, Exxon, etc.), so what do they care about losing us due to environmental concerns?

There have been discussions on Subaru forums about peeps wanting 300hp+ from a 2.5L NA Subaru engine for aero use.
Yes, can be done, but at what cost?
Most is in the experimental arena.

As to going LPG, it usually is a big drop in power due to the lower power density of the fuel compared to gasoline, leaded or unleaded.

Really hard to beat gasoline for now. Anywhere close is big money to get there.

Hey, I am all for innovation, yes, we need to move from leaded fuel, but there are tradeoffs.
Just ask the peeps that get ethanol blends for cars based on season. There is a MPG drop because of it. The little performance gain due to ethanol cooling is more than offset (thus far) by the lower power density of the fuel.
This is more common in northern bits of the US, especially in metro areas (I am in the NY metro area).
I log my fuel mileage, I can tell when fuel stations go from summer blend to winter blend. It averages 15% drop in mileage.


Wrong again, Charlie.
In the era of smallish 50-100HP auto engines in Germany in the 70's we used to flog them for many hours at full throttle on the Autobahn. They were made for this abuse and lasted just as long as those in a taxi.
Herb
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pulse Oximeters are getting cheaper! Uncle Fuzzy Soaring 3 June 13th 09 11:30 PM
Tows at Ely [email protected] Soaring 1 April 22nd 09 12:45 PM
Aerotrekking: Why isn't it cheaper? Larry Dighera Piloting 4 January 21st 07 04:02 PM
A cheaper way to fly? Ronnie Owning 7 June 5th 06 12:54 AM
Flying just got cheaper!! [email protected] Piloting 16 April 28th 06 06:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.