![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:27:00 -0800, ktr wrote:
This could also spark a battery "arms race". Now not only would pilots need to fork over the big bucks for the latest and greatest air frame, they would also need to spend big bucks on the biggest, baddest battery available. Not necessarily. Here's what happens in the model world. If they take even a passing look at how electric power is used in model competition classes (F1Q free flight and F5B radio control) they use onboard energy limiters. Exactly what the limiter does depends on the class: In F1Q the model climbs under power until either 30 seconds has elapsed or the motor has chewed through its power limit (4 joules per gram of model weight). The first of these to occur ends the motor run and the model continues in gliding flight until it lands or maximum flight time for the event is reached. Competitors are scored on the total flight time they achieve over a set number of flights. In F5B each flight is multitask: the model first flies laps round two pylons for 2 minutes after which it is expected to soar for a further 10 minutes, ending with a spot landing. The flight is scored on the number of laps flown, the difference between the soaring flight time and 10 minutes (the difference between actual flight time and 600 seconds reduces the score) and the distance the model lands from the spot (the closer to the spot it stops, the higher the score). There is an energy limiter in the model that shuts the motor down as soon as the energy limit is reached and prevents it starting again during that flight. In view of this CIAM experience (CIAM is part of the FAI) I wouldn't expect any electric manned glider class to have a hard limit on power used, but I *would* expect every glider to carry a sealed energy logger fitted between battery and motor and for this log, which might be included in an enhanced IGC flight log, to be downloaded and scored when the IGC flight log is checked. I'd expect then to apply a penalty (a big DQ?) for exceeding the energy limit and possibly a bonus for finishing with energy usage below the limit. It would be reasonable to put limits put on battery size and weight (there is in F5B) and probable that the energy limit would be set well below the maximum capacity of suitable batteries (as in F1Q and F5B). -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturday 072807 in Oshkosh Pt 4 - the Eclipse Concept Jet [4/5] - "Eclipse Concept Jet 4.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 31st 07 04:02 PM |
Saturday 072807 in Oshkosh Pt 4 - the Eclipse Concept Jet [3/5] - "Eclipse Concept Jet 3.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 31st 07 04:02 PM |
Saturday 072807 in Oshkosh Pt 4 - the Eclipse Concept Jet [2/5] - "Eclipse Concept Jet 2.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 31st 07 04:02 PM |
Saturday 072807 in Oshkosh Pt 4 - the Eclipse Concept Jet [1/5] - "Eclipse Concept Jet 1.jpg" yEnc (0/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 31st 07 04:02 PM |
Saturday 072807 in Oshkosh Pt 4 - the Eclipse Concept Jet [1/5] - "Eclipse Concept Jet 1.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 31st 07 04:02 PM |