![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Scott
Ferrin confessed the following: What I don't get is how you can claim this is a religious war. Try re-reading my original statement: [quote to TJP] And what about the notion that our "lengthy" occupation of Iraq being seen ******by muslims**** as a war against their religion? [unquote] Now let's review. I don't claim this is a religious war. I claim that muslims now view our continued occupation of Iraq as a war against islam. You and I don't get to frame their perception of US occupation of Iraq...they do. You claim this is simply one campaign in the war against terror. But that claim is BS to most people on the planet. Here's what we all know. Saddam had ZERO to do with 9/11, he had been "contained" since 1991, the almost uniformly ****ty intel [USAF Intel held a dissenting opinion from what I read] was wrong about WMD, the 9/11 Commission concludes that there was ZERO operational cooperation between Hussein's despotic regime and al-****ing-qaeda. ZERO evidence that Saddam Hussein was planning any terrorist attack against the US. The events since gwb declared "mission accomplished" indicate gwb was GROSSLY in error. But hey, he was grossly in error about exporting good ole uhmurikan democracy smack dap in the middle of the arab world. The current fighting around Najaf is against men demonstrating loyalty (or getting paid) to a guy that was anti-Saddam Hussein (just like george bush). But this guy want's part of the "action" WRT running Iraq. He wants to form an islamic state. This guy would be supremely happy to never see an american face again...if we would just leave. But that ain't gonna happen. We don't really give a rat's ass what religion they are, it's the fact that they (the terrorists) want us dead and will do whatever they can to do it. Well since there were no al-Qaeda camps in Iraq before we invaded your point is irrelevant WRT the fight around Najaf. And fortunately the military commanders in Iraq do not share your binary [black/white, on/off, "with us" (patriot)/"against us" (terrorist)] POV. Last night I read a quote from a USMC Col or Gen commanding some troops near Najaf. Paraphrasing (cause I'll be damned if I will take the time to hunt for it now) he said..."WRT to fighting a guerilla war against insurgents [NOT TERRORISTS] around Najaf, we [USMC good guys] must be sensitive to the religious implications of attacking forces hiding in a holy muslim shrine." My point? ****** [If you read nothing else read this!]******* The officers and men fighting in Iraq characterize the combat as guerilla war against insurgents...not some monolithic terrorist cabal. Nor do they paint a picture of a religious war. But they also must take steps to mitigate any appearance of making this a war against islam. The latter clearly acknowledges what many muslims already think. The terrorists happen to be Islamic and are using their religion to try to justify it. We couldn't care less if they were Catholic, Buddist, or Holy Rollers. It's their actions not their religion that is causing the problem. Here's your logic, al-qaeda terrorists attacked us, we're fighting terrorism, ergo ANYBODY that attacks americans inside Iraq must be a terrorist. Elegantly simple...but oh so simplistic, and simply faulty logic. If you truly think MaS and his followers are terrorists, why hasn't gwb or his dick [cheney] ever mentioned MaS as a terrorist? Answer? They know MaS is an extremist cleric NOT a terrorist. In April 2004 the stated policy (articulated by the US General briefing the press in Baghdad) was to capture or kill ANYBODY killing US forces or inciting others to kill US troops. But this policy is on hold as we try to get MaS to leave the shrine in Najaf. Our occupation of Iraq will be lengthy. It will tie up resources that could have been used in the real war against terrorists, and limit our options elsewhere. It must...finite resources...most resources tied up in Iraq or stateside reconstituting for a return to Iraq...means you have limited your options for any other crisis. Robey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
RI National Guard Air Show 2004 | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | June 17th 04 08:08 PM |
Moffett Air Show 2004 | JD | Military Aviation | 10 | June 11th 04 07:37 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
Edwards air show B-1 speed record attempt | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 146 | November 3rd 03 05:18 PM |