![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:25:27 -0400, "Lawrence Dillard"
wrote: Recall that the inline Allison-powered P-40, developed from a radial-powered predecessor, benefitted from such an aft-fuselage stretch, improving its fineness ratio, allowing for drag-reduction at the tailfin-rudder interface, and even allowing for fitment of a low-pressure variant of the RR Merlin. Had the stretched P-40 been given the Merlin 20 series engine, it could have become a serious high-altitude competitor. The P-40F and L had the Merlin 20, and the L the stretched fuselage. I suspect you mean the Merlin 60 series, but as the first Packard Merlin 60-series scale production didn't begin until the second half of 1943, I can't see why the better Mustang airframe would have been passed over in favour of what everybody was calling an obselete airframe by 1942. The Merlin 20-engined P40's were out-performed by the Merlin 45-engined Spitfire V as interceptors to start with, so it made no sense to miss out on Spitfire IX/VIII production to use the engines concerned to produce Merlin 60-engined P-40s. Ballasting was not usually a good solution. In the Spitfire, for example, ballasting was not very efficient when used in conjunction with the wider and heavier Griffons, rendering tricky handling and at least one test-establishment evaluation calling for cessation of production of Griffon variants for that reason. That was an early variant of the F.21, where the evaluation establishment went beyond their remit, and where in any case the problem was fixed. Meanwhile, two Griffon-engined versions had previously gone into service, the first (the Mk XII) about eighteen months beforehand, and the second (the Mk XIV) with great success, being called the best single-engined fighter tested by the AFDU to that point. Gavin Bailey -- Apply three phase AC 415V direct to MB. This work real good. How you know, you ask? Simple, chip get real HOT. System not work, but no can tell from this. Exactly same as before. Do it now. - Bart Kwan En |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Andreasson designs | Bob Babcock | Home Built | 5 | March 4th 04 09:15 PM |
Boeing's WW 2 Disc Designs | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 6 | February 23rd 04 05:59 AM |
Performance Designs 60 x 66 wood prop | Sam Hoskins | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 10th 03 01:22 AM |
Marine team designs and flies homemade, muscle-powered plane | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 26th 03 12:41 AM |
Why are delta wing designs reputed to lose speed during turns? | Air Force Jayhawk | Military Aviation | 2 | September 25th 03 12:50 PM |