![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It took a double-whammy of the A-bomb and Ivan crossing into Manchuria and Korea to end the war. The A-bomb alone might not have been enough. Anything that prevents OLYMPIC and CORONET from having to be executed had to be done. Period. The Japanese Cabinet was meeting to discuss Hiroshima and the Soviet invasion when word reached them of the Nagasaki strike. Next day Hirohito decides that enough is enough. 14 Aug is the attempted putsch that fails and the Surrender announcement comes on the 15th. Next probable nuclear strike date was on 18 Aug with Kokura as the primary. Bomb #3 was about to leave Los Alamos on 10 Aug when a hold order arrived. Two bombs and a million and a half Russians in the space of four days forced Japan's surrender. End of story and of war. Venik wrote: Keith Willshaw wrote: That just whacked a huge number of civilians. Well no. Are you saying that a large number of civilians was not killed in that bombing? Hirsohima was not only the home port for much of the Japanese Navy it was also the home of 2nd Army Headquarters, which commanded the defense of all of southern Japan. There were large numbers of troops based there. At least 3 divisions IRC The bombing did not target any specific military facilities. According to the Japanese figures, military casualties from the attack accounted for less than 3% of the overall casualties. Thus, for every Japanese soldier killed in the Hiroshima bombing there was 97% of "collateral damage." So, no, it was not the greatest strategic air mission. Getting the enemy to surrender unconditionally is about as strategic as it gets. The Soviet advances were the primary reason for the fact that the Japs were even considering a surrender. They figured maybe Stalin won't stop with the Kurils. Same situation as with the Germans trying to surrender to the Americans and nobody nuked them. -- Regards, Venik Visit my site: http://www.aeronautics.ru If you need to e-mail me, please use the following subject line: ?Subject=Newsgr0ups_resp 0nse Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Greatest Strategic Air Missions? | Leadfoot | Military Aviation | 66 | September 19th 04 05:09 PM |
Russian recon planes fly ten missions over Baltics | B2431 | Military Aviation | 4 | March 2nd 04 04:44 AM |
New Story on my Website | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 42 | February 18th 04 05:01 AM |
French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 06:48 PM |
Strategic Command Missions Rely on Space | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 09:59 PM |