A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fly tight for tight bomb patterns on the ground.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old August 25th 04, 03:24 AM
Guy Alcala
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave Eadsforth wrote:

In article , Guy Alcala
writes


snip

As to the technique of individual bombers aiming and bombing a target in a
stream,
AFAIK that was only practised by the RAF at night, from 1944 or so on (for
precision attacks, that is). This appears to have been adopted because
Churchill
was worried about French civilian casualties from collateral damage if the
transportation plan was adopted. However, it was found that Bomber Command
(well,
5 Group anyway, usually led by 617 as target markers), was able to bomb
marshalling
yards accurately and keep the collateral damage down, by bombing individually
instead of in formation. Using large formations would have caused too much
spillover damage -- even with a 100% accurate MPI, the bomb coverage area of a
big
formation was so large that numerous bombs were bound to hit outside the target
area. With individual bombers, even the occasional gross aiming error resulted
in
fewer bombs hitting civilian areas. Note that this technique was only considered
possible in areas where the defenses were rather light, i.e. over France at
night,
because the bombers lacked mutual support for defense. It's also true that such
a
risk was considered politically necessary to avoid allied civilian causualties,
whereas by 1944 (at least), none of the allied commanders cared all that much if
collateral damage from spillover due to bombing in formation killed large
numbers
of German civilians.


That's a huge thumbnail, Guy - thanks very much for devoting the time to
writing it. Archived and backed up already...


You're welcome. Oh, I forgot to mention the single most important factors that made
these Bomber Command missions possible - the targets had to be in Oboe range for
accurate marking, and the bombers had to be able to bomb visually on ground markers.
With an properly marked target and adequate visibility, accuracy could be quite
high. Of course, ocasionally the Luftwaffe would put up a decent defense in France
-- prior to the mission to Mailly-Le-Camp, tactical targets in France only counted
for partial mission credit (I think it was 1/3rd), like minelaying missions which
didn't go east of a certain longitude. The bombers suffered heavy casualties on that
raid owing to delayed marking,

http://www.raf.mod.uk/dday/timeline_may.html

See May 3-4, and that was the end of only part mission credit for French targets.
Oh, for an example of an RAF heavy bomber bombing "formation", see the first photo on
the same page. I'd like to know what the target was; with that kind of spread and
that amount of undercast it pretty much had to be a German city, with the drop made
by radar.

Guy


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A BOMB PATTER IS LIKE A FOOTBALL ArtKramr Military Aviation 17 March 3rd 04 01:54 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
AIRCRAFT MUNITIONS - THE COBALT BOMB Garrison Hilliard Military Aviation 1 August 29th 03 09:22 AM
Aircraft bomb frag patterns Mike D Military Aviation 6 August 24th 03 05:16 AM
FORMATIONS, BOMB RUNS AND RADIUS OF ACTION ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 August 10th 03 02:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.