A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Blade type VHF antenna?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old December 13th 03, 04:28 AM
Roger Halstead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:58:17 +1100, smithxpj
wrote:

On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:01:29 -0800, Jim Weir wrote:

It depends ENTIRELY on how they are foreshortening the antenna. If they are
using super-wide conductors (the entire width of the blade) to get the
foreshortening, then it is a very efficient antenna. If they are using loading
coils inside with a relatively narrow antenna diameter, it is a very inefficient
antenna.

The only way to know for sure is to ask the manufacturer for a data/spec sheet
or cut the antenna open.


I tried that stunt back in the early 80's out of interest.

The couple of manufacturers that I asked were very coy about parting
with detailed information about what was inside their antennas. It was
very generic stuff like..."a printed circuit etched radiator with
double sided etched capacitors and inductors appropriately tapped to
the radiator to achieve optimum matching" !!!

I once managed to get access to an industrial X-ray machine and got a
picture of the innards of a Collins military VHF-UHF blade antenna.
Eye opening stuff, indeed...but trying to reproduce it? It would
hardly be worth the manhour effort compared with knocking up a 26"
piece of 1/8" brazing rod into a 1/4 wave radiator.


If it's a blade type, why not put in a flat piece of brass or copper
stock and trim for resonance, or use a matching network?
I'd think something that large (length to width) wouldn't take much
loading. OTOH I guess linear loading could be used. Double sided
circuit board with the back a thin ground....maybe widening out to
provide more capacitance near the end... It'd take some
experimenting, but I'd think it'd work.

I know...Lots of weasel words, but I haven't actually tried it so it's
more thinking out loud.


Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?)
www.rogerhalstead.com
Return address modified due to dumb virus checkers

Jim




Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) Snowbird Home Built 78 December 3rd 03 09:10 PM
Marker Beacon Antenna - Paging Jim Weir. Bart D. Hull Home Built 1 November 27th 03 10:31 PM
Type of wing carrythrough? Toks Desalu Home Built 0 October 30th 03 08:35 PM
Foil antenna and carbon fiber BD5ER Home Built 11 August 6th 03 04:44 AM
Antenna Ground Plane Grounding Fastglasair Home Built 1 July 8th 03 05:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.