![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are an anomaly...deviation from the common rule
...something different, abnormal, peculiar, or not easily classified. I suppose.... but out of my UPT class, I'm the only one who has ever applied his trade in combat...I guess its just a case of why you wanted to be an Air Force pilot. The two guys in my class who took F-15Cs have probably had a lot of fun flying around the local MOA and out at RED FLAG, but that's not what I wanted to do. I suppose your BUFF comrades look at you with a YGBSM expression when you announce..."Yeah, BUFFs were my first choice..." A few of them do, but most also realize that, at least since 1995, B-52s have made a tremendous impact on the National Security of the U.S. and its the platform to be in if that's your goal. Flying around the flag pole at Mach 2 may be pretty cool, but it pales in comparison to dropping a JDAM on a Taliban mortor team in regards to defending the country. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While I understand your pride in accomplishment as well as your
rationale of going to a combat system, I've got to say that my reading of the papers (as well as encounters with a lot of Ego and Viper types) would seem to indicate that both Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom (as well as the Afghan and Bosnia excursions) have had more than enough opportunity for the tactical types to get a whiff of gunpowder. Ed, I never said the other numerous AF platforms haven't contributed, but no aircraft, save the B-1B, has struck as many targets since 1995 as the B-52. Additionally, since 1995, there has never been more than 45 operational B-52 aircrew at any one time. Your odds of getting deployed in an actual conflict are astronomically higher than in every weapons system except the Bone or the U-2. I've been friends with an F-16 pilot since 1997 and (at least prior to OIF) he had not dropped a weapon in anger. So, once again, I'll state that if your goal is to defend this country by being involved in its conflicts, your best bet is a BUFF. Might we be a bit parochial here? Not at all. Just some good natured "chest pumping" ![]() BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, BUFDRVR
blurted out: You are an anomaly...deviation from the common rule ...something different, abnormal, peculiar, or not easily classified. I suppose.... but out of my UPT class, I'm the only one who has ever applied his trade in combat... Dude...did you read that last sentence before you hit "send?" You think any of your UPT buds in C-130s hauling bullets and beans would buy that self-serving BS? Think KC-135/-10 guys passing gas would nod their head in agreement? How about the EWOs or DSOs in your jet? How many SAM or AI radars have they battled since 1995? ....And if it's true that your F-16/F-15E classmates have not dropped live in Iraq or Afghanistan...the system is ****ed up 'cause every swinging dick ANG air-to-mud guy/gal has over the course of several deployments since 1991. I guess its just a case of why you wanted to be an Air Force pilot. Hey easy for me...I wanted to be the commander of USAFE, or TAC, say "Two, Bingo, Mayday...Lead you're on fire." I wanted to eat jager schnitzel mit pomme frites in the german village where I lived for three year; I didn't want to spend all my career PCS'd to CONUS; I wanted to fly fast and low and hear BRASSMONKEY on Guard; Ivan and Kim Il-Sung were the enemy. I didn't ask myself, "Self...which aerial platform will most likely provide the greatest benefit in terms of standoff weapons employement with the concomitant minimum sorties." I wanted to have fun while running around in a green and brown mottled Phantoms with my fangs out, hair on fire. A few of them do, but most also realize that, at least since 1995, B-52s have made a tremendous impact on the National Security of the U.S. and its the platform to be in if that's your goal. Flying around the flag pole at Mach 2 may be pretty cool, but it pales in comparison to dropping a JDAM on a Taliban mortor team in regards to defending the country. A noble jesture on your part, you had the prescience to select the B-52...every UPT grad I ever asked says they wanted to fly fighters, but they busted a check-ride, the wife/girlfriend rejected the notion, etc. NOBODY ever said they wanted to fly BUFFS or tankers. Bottom line...I respect you as an air warrior. I don't know you but your claim that BUFFs (not even BONEs) were your first choice is interesting. Juvat |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:54:17 GMT, Juvat
wrote: Dude...did you read that last sentence before you hit "send?" You think any of your UPT buds in C-130s hauling bullets and beans would buy that self-serving BS? Think KC-135/-10 guys passing gas would nod their head in agreement? How about the EWOs or DSOs in your jet? How many SAM or AI radars have they battled since 1995? ...And if it's true that your F-16/F-15E classmates have not dropped live in Iraq or Afghanistan...the system is ****ed up 'cause every swinging dick ANG air-to-mud guy/gal has over the course of several deployments since 1991. Hey easy for me...I wanted to be the commander of USAFE, or TAC, say "Two, Bingo, Mayday...Lead you're on fire." I wanted to eat jager schnitzel mit pomme frites in the german village where I lived for three year; I didn't want to spend all my career PCS'd to CONUS; I wanted to fly fast and low and hear BRASSMONKEY on Guard; Ivan and Kim Il-Sung were the enemy. I didn't ask myself, "Self...which aerial platform will most likely provide the greatest benefit in terms of standoff weapons employement with the concomitant minimum sorties." I wanted to have fun while running around in a green and brown mottled Phantoms with my fangs out, hair on fire. A noble jesture on your part, you had the prescience to select the B-52...every UPT grad I ever asked says they wanted to fly fighters, but they busted a check-ride, the wife/girlfriend rejected the notion, etc. NOBODY ever said they wanted to fly BUFFS or tankers. Bottom line...I respect you as an air warrior. I don't know you but your claim that BUFFs (not even BONEs) were your first choice is interesting. Juvat Twoop!! And, "Lead, you really are on fire...." Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suppose.... but out of my UPT class, I'm the only one who has ever applied
his trade in combat... Dude...did you read that last sentence before you hit "send?" You think any of your UPT buds in C-130s hauling bullets and beans No one in my class got C-130's. would buy that self-serving BS? Self serving ? It's a fact. Think KC-135/-10 guys passing gas would nod their head in agreement? Only 1 KC-135 in my class, did the third pilot thing, went back to AETC to fly -37s. The only guy I may have short changed in my class was a guy going to T-37's with a C-17 follow on, but I later heard he stayed in -37s, not sure where he is now. How about the EWOs or DSOs in your jet? How many SAM or AI radars have they battled since 1995? Every combat sortie I've flown, if the EW wasn't jamming something, he was helping out by copying 9-lines and backing up the Nav team on targeting. ...And if it's true that your F-16/F-15E classmates have not dropped live in Iraq or Afghanistan...the system is ****ed up 'cause every swinging dick ANG air-to-mud guy/gal has over the course of several deployments since 1991. Only 1 F-16 guy (forgot about him in my earlier post) who was flying Cs out of Cannon. He *may* have gotten some OIF time, but I'm not sure. The only other fighter guys were F-15Cs. I didn't want to spend all my career PCS'd to CONUS I feel the exact opposite. I didn't ask myself, "Self...which aerial platform will most likely provide the greatest benefit in terms of standoff weapons employement with the concomitant minimum sorties." We do more than stand-off...I would think you would know that. In fact, I've only flown 1 CALCM combat sortie. And I didn't ask my self that question either. I wanted to drop a lot of weapons and be involved in the conflicts this nation fought. Your ego must be *huge* if you can't grasp that not everyone wants to do what you do. every UPT grad I ever asked says they wanted to fly fighters Well, if you ever run into a Viper pilot, call sign Tank, from Class 95-10 at Vance ask him about the guy in his class who took the BUFF. but they busted a check-ride Never busted a check-ride, in fact me, Tank and the #1 guy who took an Eagle were the only ones in our class that dodged that. the wife/girlfriend rejected the notion My wife could have cared less what aircraft I took... I don't know you but your claim that BUFFs (not even BONEs) were your first choice is interesting. Well, originally showing up at Vance in June '94 I wanted a Bone, but there was an ex-B-1B maintenance officer in my class (one of the Eagle drivers) and he kind of talked me out of it. At the time, all the Bone could carry was Mk-82s and they were even having problems with those. He told of the horrible FMC rate and the number of cancelled sorties they had. By the time -38s rolled around I had changed my mind and swapped my #2 (BUFF) for the Bone. I still can't believe you're having trouble with this. I met guys in UPT who wanted nothing more than to fly for the airlines and they wanted cargo, or even better a KC-10. I watched an entire class of Academy grads pass up F-16s for C-21s to Peterson AFB. There were two Vipers in that drop and they went to two guys in the bottom of the class. Relax, neither made it out of IFF. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Juvat- NOBODY ever said they wanted to fly BUFFS or tankers. BRBR
I actually knew a guy that 'wanted' P-3ss..honest..but yer right, most want fastmovers. A bit different in the USN, when you are in the jet pipeline, you are going to probably get a tactical jet but some 'wanted' S-3s and EA-6Bs...but they squated to pee.... P. C. Chisholm CDR, USN(ret.) Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bufdrvr- Hmmm, at least in the bomber community, taking a dump is not
considered an accomplishment.....I always suspected it was in the fighter community though.. BRBR Yep, but you can get up, wander back past the bunks with lace curtains, sit down in the ****ter while listening to music or watch a DVD, while the 'stew' is busy making your lunch... P. C. Chisholm CDR, USN(ret.) Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep, but you can get up, wander back past the bunks with lace curtains,
Hmm... sitdown in the ****ter Have never taken a dump on a BUFF (even on several 30+ hour sorties)...and hope to God I never have to. while listening to music or watch a DVD The pilots can't really watch a DVD, no place to put the player in the pilots station....although I have listened to more than my share of movies droning back from Afghanistan. while the 'stew'is busy making your lunch. Boy...that would be great... BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air defense (naval and air force) | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | September 18th 04 04:42 PM |
JSF is too heavy for the Royal Navy | Mike | Military Aviation | 1 | May 18th 04 09:16 AM |
Navy Wants Warplane Back From Civilian | Rusty Barton | Military Aviation | 1 | March 28th 04 07:56 PM |
AF, Navy NCOs trade places in leadership course | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 7th 03 12:39 AM |
Crash involved veteran Navy airmen | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 2nd 03 10:49 PM |