![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, David Megginson said:
In Canada, a flying club (at least in my part of the country) is essentially a non-profit FBO, and some of them date back to the 1920's to 1940's (in the late 1920's, for example, our flying club founded Oshawa Flying Club was founded on Commonwealth Air Training Plan cast-off aircraft. Like Ottawa it's got a club house with a snack bar that appears to be staffed on weekends, and a huge number of members. In the U.S., it sounds like a flying club is more like a big partnership. I think there are US clubs like yours, but ours is essentially a big partnership. There are two flying clubs at Greater Rochester International Airport, ours which charges only a nominal initiation fee ($750) and Artisan which sells you a share (over $16,000 last time I checked). Ours doesn't refund anything when you quit, and Artisan buys your share back. They've also got a better plane/member ratio. I've seen flying clubs in the US where there are members who own their own planes which they make available to the club members as a sort of lease-back thing. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ It could have been raining flaming bulldozers, and those idiots would have been standing out there smoking, going 'hey, look at that John Deere burn!' -- Texan AMD security guard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 11-Sep-2003, Chris Spierings wrote: The last guy to do it, did an outstanding job but spent 20-30 hours a week some weeks riding herd on things and verifying that the fbo and its maintenance folks did what they said they did and then did it properly. Unless this time includes some "owner-operator" maintenance like oil changes, or your fleet includes something exotic, 20-30 hrs per week to "ride herd on things" seems really excessive. I doubt that my co-owners and I collectively spend more than 1 hr per week on average to see to it that routine and unanticipated maintenance gets done on our Arrow. Maybe the problem is the FBO that is doing your maintenance. In our case, when we need maintenance we call the chief mechanic at our FBO and he sees to it that the plane is serviced as requested. Squawks are communicated between the owners by e-mail, but we could also do it by postings to the plane's web site. -- -Elliott Drucker |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It isn't just the maintenance. In a typical club, just about everything
that happens on the ramp will fall into the MO's lap. With a few co-owners communication is easy. With 20 - 30 members there is a lot more communication required. The PIC has a very high level of responsibility for the condition of the aircraft when the wheels leave the ground. It isn't practical to let 30 members go through the logbooks so keeping them informed and up to date on AD's and other maintenance issues so they have a basis for fulfilling their responsibility is a big part of the job. Owner's are also far more responsible for the maintenance of the aircraft than many (or most) realize. It isn't sufficient to just call the shop and tell them to do whatever needs to be done and put the plane back on line. The MO should be up to date on things like AD's, independently verifying that the shop is doing what is required, checking logbook entries, etc. This takes some time. The owner / operator is responsible for the maintenance. The shop works for the owner / operator. The owner / operator is required to supervise the shop. -- Roger Long |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" om writes:
It isn't practical to let 30 members go through the logbooks so keeping them informed and up to date on AD's and other maintenance issues so they have a basis for fulfilling their responsibility is a big part of the job. That's an interesting national difference -- in Canada, the first step of every flying lesson I took, from my intro flight on, was going through the journey log to check for airworthiness. The big items were compass swing, ELT check, and last inspection, but we also had to look for snags, deferred defects, etc. They didn't have us check for AD's. When you sign out a plane from the dispatch desk at my flying club, you always get the Hobbs board and the big blue journey log (usually falling apart to some degree). Nowadays, I just keep my Warrior's journey log in the flight bag. All the best, David |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It isn't really a national difference. Strictly speaking, every club member
here should read through the logs also. In the real world, it wouldn't mean much to them though. The words "Maintenance Officer" don't appear in the regulations. The fact that there is one does not change the PIC's responsibility one whit. The PIC is delegating part of the job to the MO but remains just as responsible. The PIC better trust the MO and be sure he is doing the job. If there is an incident or a ramp check, telling the inspector "Oh, we have a maintenance officer and he takes care of all that stuff." isn't going to demonstrate that the PIC was able to fulfil his responsibility. Being able to pull out a book carried in the plane and show summaries of AD compliance, next required maintenance times, etc. may not meet the strictest interpretation of the regs but should usually be sufficient in the real world. If it's backed up by evidence that the owner's supervise and verify that the MO is doing his job and the MO supervises and verifies that the shop is doing theirs, they will probably be satisfied that there is not a pattern of disregard for the regulations. They'll still nail you on some obscure little point that you missed if the want to. If they think you are trying, they'll be less likely to want to. -- Roger Long David Megginson wrote in message ... "Roger Long" om writes: It isn't practical to let 30 members go through the logbooks so keeping them informed and up to date on AD's and other maintenance issues so they have a basis for fulfilling their responsibility is a big part of the job. That's an interesting national difference -- in Canada, the first step of every flying lesson I took, from my intro flight on, was going through the journey log to check for airworthiness. The big items were compass swing, ELT check, and last inspection, but we also had to look for snags, deferred defects, etc. They didn't have us check for AD's. When you sign out a plane from the dispatch desk at my flying club, you always get the Hobbs board and the big blue journey log (usually falling apart to some degree). Nowadays, I just keep my Warrior's journey log in the flight bag. All the best, David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris,
I am the Operations Officer for our club of 4 aircraft, www.glendaleflying.com. I am not a A&P, so it I had a learning curve. I think it was a great move. I have learned more about ever system of our planes than I thought I would. You will discuss issues with mechanics, research regs, AD, SB and get some hands on experience if you really get into it. You can get familiar enough to order your own parts and save money that way as well. I have been very envolved with the purchase of our 4th plane and buying a new engine for our Skylane. I could have never done that on my own without the help of a lottery. I have started to do all of our own preventative mx, which has saved the club a lot of money. This all does take a lot of my time, but I feel compensated with education. I feel very comfortable that if I am stranded at an aiport away from home with a mx issue, I will be able to have a good idea of what the problem is and the level of seriousness it brings. We originally has a crew chief for each aircraft as well, but I soon found myself managing 4 people as well as 4 aircraft. If your help isn't deticated things don't get done. I now have an assistant that I can really count on to help keep thind supplies, make some calls and ferry some planes. If you take the position, enjoy it. Feel free to contact me further if you'd like. Tony www.glendaleflying.com Chris Spierings wrote in message ... I'm a member of a local flying club which has ~30 members and 3 aircraft. A number of the club's long standing members have moved on in the last year or so and now its time for some of the other folks to step up and take the reins. One of the jobs that is open is the club maintenance officer. The last guy to do it, did an outstanding job but spent 20-30 hours a week some weeks riding herd on things and verifying that the fbo and its maintenance folks did what they said they did and then did it properly. Could anyone share information on the arrangements they've been associated with in terms of overseeing aircraft maintenance. If its in a club setting even better. I hoping the experiences of the group will give us more options than asking one poor soul to bear the burden of all of this on their own. Thanks Chris Spierings |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Read this on your club's website - History. www.glendaleflying.com)
Glendale has always been based at Bowman Field in Louisville, Kentucky, at one time the busiest airport in the country. Really? When? More history please. Very nice website, BTW. Enjoy looking at the trip photos. -- Montblack ("Tony" wrote) I am the Operations Officer for our club of 4 aircraft, www.glendaleflying.com. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure thing.
Here is another link to Louisville Intl's website about Bowman Field: http://www.louintlairport.com/HtmlFi...man/lia-9d.htm Tony "Montblack" wrote in message ... (Read this on your club's website - History. www.glendaleflying.com) Glendale has always been based at Bowman Field in Louisville, Kentucky, at one time the busiest airport in the country. Really? When? More history please. Very nice website, BTW. Enjoy looking at the trip photos. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice site, but...
....85$/hr for a wet tach 182?! I have to stop reading non-Bay Area club web sites I get too depressed. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Spierings wrote in message ...
I'm a member of a local flying club which has ~30 members and 3 aircraft. A number of the club's long standing members have moved on in the last year or so and now its time for some of the other folks to step up and take the reins. One of the jobs that is open is the club maintenance officer. The last guy to do it, did an outstanding job but spent 20-30 hours a week some weeks riding herd on things and verifying that the fbo and its maintenance folks did what they said they did and then did it properly. Yes, I've done this job with just one airplane. It take a ton of time. Between making sure the IFR cert, the ELT inspection, etc is done you also are always on the phone making sure you are on the schedule for annual, ordering small parts to save money, tracking down shipments, sending off oil analysis, etc ,etc. Add to that any need to move the plane for maintenance since few fields have all the different types of maintenance available. I am 100% sure that a club with 3 planes could take 20 hours a week. Perhaps each plane needs its own guy? -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | June 12th 04 03:03 AM |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | General Aviation | 0 | June 12th 04 02:14 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Chuck Yeager to help flying club in Germany celebrate its 50th, By Lisa Horn, Stars and Stripes | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | June 9th 04 09:25 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |