A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Club Management Issue



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 26th 04, 12:15 AM
Dan Truesdell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John T wrote:
"Dan Truesdell" wrote in message


The mechanic was also on the trip, and was getting paid for his time.
Makes it a part 135 operation as far as the FAA is concerned, even if
"Mark" didn't receive a dime.




OK, I'm willing to buy that.

For the sake of discussion, would Mark be able to accept any payment if he
were ferrying only the replacement crew to retrieve the plane?

Phrased another way: Your plane is stranded at another airport and you ask
me to fly you out to retrieve it. How much money can you offer me and how
much of that can I legally accept?


I would presume that ferrying a plane for no cost would not fall under a
"commercial" operation. Since you would not be in the plane, there is
no possibility of sharing the cost.



--
Remove "2PLANES" to reply.

  #2  
Old March 26th 04, 04:39 AM
Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The mechanic was also on the trip, and was getting paid for his time.
Makes it a part 135 operation as far as the FAA is concerned, even if
"Mark" didn't receive a dime.



OK, I'm willing to buy that.


I am not. Is there a specific rule that says that because someone on the
plane is getting paid to go somewhere that it is now a 135 operation?

Let's see. You pay your chauffer for coming with you on your Jet so he can
drive you around when you get there. Now, your privately owned jet has a
pilot, co pilot and chauffer on board and they are all getting paid to go.
Now its 135?



  #3  
Old March 28th 04, 04:53 AM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default





"Dude" wrote in message
...

I am not. Is there a specific rule that says that because someone on the
plane is getting paid to go somewhere that it is now a 135 operation?


You are correct -- there is no such rule. In fact, you could could pay a
flight instructor to come along in an airplane you own and it is not a
commercial operation. Even if the instructor acts as PIC, he need only have
a third class medical in fact; a second class medical is not required for
flight instruction.

--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com


  #4  
Old March 27th 04, 01:49 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Dan Truesdell wrote:

The mechanic was also on the trip, and was getting paid for his time.
Makes it a part 135 operation as far as the FAA is concerned, even if
"Mark" didn't receive a dime.


I doubt that. The FAA specifically says that, if several employees are expected
to attend a meeting (for example), and one of them flies the group there, he can
accept compensation from the company for the trip, in addition to his salary. In
that case, every one of his fellow employees are drawing their salary, and that's
not part 135.

George Patterson
Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would
not yield to the tongue.
  #5  
Old March 28th 04, 04:50 AM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default




"Dan Truesdell" wrote in message
...

The mechanic was also on the trip, and was getting paid for his time.
Makes it a part 135 operation as far as the FAA is concerned, even if
"Mark" didn't receive a dime.


Actually, the paid mechanic's presence does nothing at all to make this a
Part 135 operation. The mechanic was not part of the flight crew so his
presence was irrelevant for the purpose of determining if this is Part 135.
If you want to hire a cabin attendant and/or onboard entertainer for your
Part 91 flights, that is just fine as long as they are not flight crew.

Interestingly, you could also hire a paid flight instructor and it would
STILL not be a Part 135 operation; in fact, it would not even be a
commercial for hire operation as long as the flight instructor did not
provide the airplane.

--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members Andrew Gideon Aviation Marketplace 1 June 12th 04 03:03 AM
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members Andrew Gideon General Aviation 0 June 12th 04 02:14 AM
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post MrHabilis Home Built 0 June 11th 04 05:07 PM
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! Bill Mulcahy General Aviation 3 October 1st 03 05:39 AM
September issue of Afterburner now on line Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 9th 03 09:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.