A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aluminum instrument panel finish?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 3rd 04, 01:18 AM
nauga
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Selling a homebuilt is not consistent with the regulatory advantages
provided to those building their own airplane, that they intend
to operate.


Nothing in the CFR about "intent to operate." If a person
builds an airplane "for education or recreation" there
is nothing in the CFR that prevents them from selling it.

Hired guns or building for the express purpose of resale
are other matters altogether.

Dave 'twist and crawl' Hyde



  #2  
Old February 3rd 04, 01:50 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"nauga" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Selling a homebuilt is not consistent with the regulatory advantages
provided to those building their own airplane, that they intend
to operate.


Nothing in the CFR about "intent to operate." If a person
builds an airplane "for education or recreation" there
is nothing in the CFR that prevents them from selling it.


That is correct.

Hired guns or building for the express purpose of resale
are other matters altogether.


Yes.


  #3  
Old February 3rd 04, 11:42 PM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"nauga" wrote in message link.net...

Nothing in the CFR about "intent to operate." If a person
builds an airplane "for education or recreation" there
is nothing in the CFR that prevents them from selling it.


Uh oh. My buddy sold his RV-6 and I'm currently helping him with
the RV-10 project. I don't think he's building it for "education or
recreation". I'm pretty sure he's building it so that he'll have a
kick-ass 4-place airplane to fly around in for less than 1/4 million
dollars.

I suppose the fallback position is that we're getting educated
whether we intend to or not :-)

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
  #4  
Old February 3rd 04, 06:58 AM
StellaStar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Something that really sets your plane apart. Something that
says "I just gotta be me!":

http://panel.notlong.com


I just never get tired of touting Neal's plane. I'm his biggest fan!

http://www.alioth.net/flying/flying/...heckerbird.jpg
  #5  
Old February 3rd 04, 10:17 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (StellaStar)


I just never get tired of touting Neal's plane. I'm his biggest fan!

http://www.alioth.net/flying/flying/...heckerbird.jpg


If it ever becomes unflyable he can use it as an end of runway shack with that
paint scheme. I got a chuckle out of it.

Just a matter of curiosity how visible is it in flight?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #6  
Old February 3rd 04, 08:28 PM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(StellaStar) wrote in message ...

I just never get tired of touting Neal's plane. I'm his biggest fan!

http://www.alioth.net/flying/flying/...heckerbird.jpg

Me too. I've never felt more visible in the traffic pattern.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
  #7  
Old February 2nd 04, 11:48 PM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Daniel) wrote in message . com...

After that much effort, why finish it off with the same methods used
by every other aircraft on the line? You should go for something
unique. Something that really sets your plane apart. Something that
says "I just gotta be me!":

http://panel.notlong.com


Just stay away from the one called "Classic Fruit". How'd you like
to repeat that everytime someone asks about the panel? :-)

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
  #8  
Old February 4th 04, 03:09 AM
Jeff P
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I would give it a horizontal brushed finish (or machine swirled) and
then have it etched and thick clear anodized. The etch time should be
about 3 minutes to give a somewhat matte finish. On 6061 I would say
to use a thin (.0005"-.0010") hard anodize which would give a nice
medium gray color. On 2024 the results of hard anodize are less
consistant so I recommend a thick standard anodize instead. At a
thickness of .0005"+ the color will coume out a light gray with some
goldish undertones. I think it looks good, but if you don't like it
you still have about the best paint base you could imagine.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 1 November 24th 03 03:46 PM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 2 November 24th 03 06:23 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart Hull Home Built 0 November 24th 03 04:52 AM
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. Bart D. Hull Home Built 0 November 22nd 03 07:24 AM
CAD outline of Rans S6S instrument panel? Rob Turk Home Built 2 October 21st 03 10:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.