![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
Selling a homebuilt is not consistent with the regulatory advantages provided to those building their own airplane, that they intend to operate. Nothing in the CFR about "intent to operate." If a person builds an airplane "for education or recreation" there is nothing in the CFR that prevents them from selling it. Hired guns or building for the express purpose of resale are other matters altogether. Dave 'twist and crawl' Hyde |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"nauga" wrote in message ink.net... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Selling a homebuilt is not consistent with the regulatory advantages provided to those building their own airplane, that they intend to operate. Nothing in the CFR about "intent to operate." If a person builds an airplane "for education or recreation" there is nothing in the CFR that prevents them from selling it. That is correct. Hired guns or building for the express purpose of resale are other matters altogether. Yes. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"nauga" wrote in message link.net...
Nothing in the CFR about "intent to operate." If a person builds an airplane "for education or recreation" there is nothing in the CFR that prevents them from selling it. Uh oh. My buddy sold his RV-6 and I'm currently helping him with the RV-10 project. I don't think he's building it for "education or recreation". I'm pretty sure he's building it so that he'll have a kick-ass 4-place airplane to fly around in for less than 1/4 million dollars. I suppose the fallback position is that we're getting educated whether we intend to or not :-) John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something that really sets your plane apart. Something that
says "I just gotta be me!": http://panel.notlong.com I just never get tired of touting Neal's plane. I'm his biggest fan! http://www.alioth.net/flying/flying/...heckerbird.jpg |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Daniel) wrote in message . com...
After that much effort, why finish it off with the same methods used by every other aircraft on the line? You should go for something unique. Something that really sets your plane apart. Something that says "I just gotta be me!": http://panel.notlong.com Just stay away from the one called "Classic Fruit". How'd you like to repeat that everytime someone asks about the panel? :-) John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would give it a horizontal brushed finish (or machine swirled) and
then have it etched and thick clear anodized. The etch time should be about 3 minutes to give a somewhat matte finish. On 6061 I would say to use a thin (.0005"-.0010") hard anodize which would give a nice medium gray color. On 2024 the results of hard anodize are less consistant so I recommend a thick standard anodize instead. At a thickness of .0005"+ the color will coume out a light gray with some goldish undertones. I think it looks good, but if you don't like it you still have about the best paint base you could imagine. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 03:46 PM |
| Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 06:23 AM |
| Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 04:52 AM |
| Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 07:24 AM |
| CAD outline of Rans S6S instrument panel? | Rob Turk | Home Built | 2 | October 21st 03 10:27 PM |