A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Planes from old companies



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 17th 04, 07:02 PM
Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


They have not done it yet. Cirrus and Diamond have not nearly recouped
their
investment. All three manufacturers have had to ask their investors for
more
money. Lancair darned near didn't make it.


I believe you are mistaken, where did you hear Diamond asked investors for
more money? Also, I know Cirrus has investors, but I did not hear about any
rounds of fundraising in the last couple years.


  #2  
Old November 17th 04, 09:04 PM
Javier Henderson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" writes:

"Dude" wrote in message
...
Couldn't they do it like Cirrus, Diamond, and Lancair have done it?


They have not done it yet. Cirrus and Diamond have not nearly recouped their
investment. All three manufacturers have had to ask their investors for more
money. Lancair darned near didn't make it.

I think it is an outrage. Right now the biggest impediment to aviation
safety has to be the FAA, followed closely by the insurance companies and
the trial lawyers.


How are the insurance companies against safety?

-jav
  #3  
Old November 16th 04, 03:31 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dude" wrote in message
...
Okay, its getting boring so, here is a new twist on an old subject.

Beech and Cessna have recently seen HUGE increases in demand for aircraft
with the G1000 cockpits. Will this cause them to rethink the introduction
of a new piston design to compete with the new players?

If so, how long till you can buy one and fly it?


Cessna is simply putting the G1000 in their existing airplanes.

Although the model designations remain the same, the current line of piston
airplanes is in fact all new. The Cessna 182 has changed so much that it
barely resembles the Skylanes of old. It looks more like a Cardinal on
steroids.

Next year's 172 will have the G1000 and air bags.


  #4  
Old November 16th 04, 05:35 PM
C Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dude" wrote in message
...
Okay, its getting boring so, here is a new twist on an old subject.

Beech and Cessna have recently seen HUGE increases in demand for aircraft
with the G1000 cockpits. Will this cause them to rethink the introduction
of a new piston design to compete with the new players?


About the only thing I could see might be Cessna bringing back the P-210.
It's not a huge market but it would restore a little luster to the brand. I
wouldn't bet money on it though.

-cwk.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 December 30th 04 11:16 AM
Red Alert: Terrorist build kamikaze planes for attacks Hank Higgens Home Built 5 April 16th 04 02:10 PM
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 April 15th 04 06:17 AM
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) Grantland Military Aviation 1 October 2nd 03 12:17 AM
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box Jim Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 August 23rd 03 04:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.