A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AOPA credit card --- WARNING.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 27th 04, 03:00 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"mike regish" wrote in message
news:AY%pd.572727$mD.93066@attbi_s02...

Didn't think your narrow mind could wrap itself around more than one thing
at a time. Since I never said anything about his other reasons, it is
impossible to make the conclusion you have jumped to without using
seriously flawed reasoning, but that is exactly what I would expect from
you, or any Bushie, for that matter.


Since the question was which of the reasons given for invading Iraq were
wrong, and you mentioned only WMD, it is logical to conclude you believe the
other reasons were right.


  #2  
Old November 27th 04, 06:04 PM
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That was the first one. All the others were given when each one in turn was
proven false. He ended up using the lamest after they all
failed-humanitarian. Not a lame reason in itself, but lame in that it was
the only possible one left to him and it applies so much more in other parts
of the world that just don't happen to be oil rich.

Do they still let you push tin?

mike regish

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"mike regish" wrote in message
news:AY%pd.572727$mD.93066@attbi_s02...

Didn't think your narrow mind could wrap itself around more than one
thing at a time. Since I never said anything about his other reasons, it
is impossible to make the conclusion you have jumped to without using
seriously flawed reasoning, but that is exactly what I would expect from
you, or any Bushie, for that matter.


Since the question was which of the reasons given for invading Iraq were
wrong, and you mentioned only WMD, it is logical to conclude you believe
the other reasons were right.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
For Keith Willshaw... robert arndt Military Aviation 253 July 6th 04 05:18 AM
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? Larry Dighera Instrument Flight Rules 12 April 26th 04 06:12 PM
S-TEC 60-2 audio warning Julian Scarfe Owning 7 March 1st 04 08:11 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 139 November 12th 03 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.