A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aren't You Happy You Voted For Baby Bush? (ATC Privatization)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 1st 03, 04:35 PM
Chip Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:12:03 -0400, "Chip Jones"
wrote in Message-Id:
:

[snipped]


It sounds to me like NavCanada is running the remaining major national
commercial user right on out of the airline business.


It sounds to me like NavCanada inappropriately enabled that airline to
avoid bankruptcy for an extended period.


Isn't Air Canada THE national/international Canadian airline? As in: the
Canadian government and the nation of Canada have a vested interest in
keeping ACA afloat for national reasons? What happens to Canada's economy
if ACA goes under? Serious questions here too- I know squat about Canada's
airline situation except that Air Canada is the major game in town...

Chip, ZTL


  #2  
Old July 30th 03, 08:04 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ryan Dorosh" wrote in message
...

Canada has a private, non profit ATC called NavCanada. So far it's worked
out quite well going from public to private. NavCanada has some of the

best
equipment and software in the world now. Way ahead of the rest of the

world
for technology. Sometimes, I think having ATC in the hands of a non profit
group is the best way to go. Less hurdles to make beneficial changes.


US ATC is in the hands of a non-profit group now.


  #3  
Old July 30th 03, 06:26 PM
AJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As my dear old dad used to say: The masses are asses and always elect
the government they richly deserve.
  #5  
Old August 1st 03, 12:06 PM
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

50%? I thought it was part of Demorgan's Law (80-20 rule)?


Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On 30 Jul 2003 10:26:24 -0700, (AJ) wrote in
Message-Id: :

As my dear old dad used to say: The masses are asses and always elect
the government they richly deserve.


I always say, ~50% of the population possesses a 2-digit IQ.



  #7  
Old October 17th 03, 11:20 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:47:26 -0400, "Chip Jones"
wrote in Message-Id:
:

Privatize ATC and GA is gonna be the first casualty... Terrible
idea.


And it appears Jr. hasn't abandoned his "ideological jihad for
privatization":


-------------------------------------------------------------------
AVflash Volume 9, Number 42a October 13, 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------------

....OHIO SENATOR WAFFLING...
A spokesman for DeWine admits the senator is reconsidering his
previous position. Mike Dawson told The Columbus Dispatch that the
senator must weigh whether the ban is worth risking all the funding in
the bill for Ohio airports and other provisions. According to the
Dispatch, DeWine still favors the privatization ban but he's not sure
he'd vote against the reauthorization bill if the current language
remains. Despite what must be enormous pressure from the White House
to change his vote, DeWine's fellow Ohio Republican George Voinovich
has apparently indicated to NATCA that he won't alter his position.
Ohio Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-Lorain) accused the White House of mounting
an "ideological jihad for privatization" and said the public won't
stand for it in the case of air traffic control.
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#185851
--

Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts.
-- Larry Dighera,
  #8  
Old November 4th 03, 10:07 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


-------------------------------------------------------------------
AVflash Volume 9, Number 44b October 30, 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------------

FAA BILL AMENDED AGAIN
A conference committee of the House and Senate has agreed to strip
language relating to the privatization of 69 FAA control towers from
the long-delayed FAA Reauthorization Bill but privatization opponents
say that's not the end of the debate. The bill, which should have been
passed in September, has been held up over the privatization clause
and it's still not clear how the latest move will affect its passage.
FAA spokesman Greg Martin said the new conference report will likely
be put in front of the House today and passage is expected. But
passage by the Senate is expected to take longer and Martin said a
continuation of the current temporary spending authority, which
expires Friday, will almost certainly be required.
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#185961

  #9  
Old November 4th 03, 10:30 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default




----------------------------------------------------------
AOPA ePilot Special Expo Update November 1, 2003
----------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE PASSES FAA FUNDING BILL
The House of Representatives on Thursday passed the FAA
reauthorization bill that had been bogged down in Congress over debate
about contract air traffic control towers and concerns over future
privatization of air traffic services. The bill was sent to the Senate
where action is pending, and continuing battles there are possible.
AOPA expressed concern over the FAA reauthorization bill after a
passage was deleted that opposed any future privatization of the air
traffic control system. The bill would provide $60 billion in funding
for airport upgrades, security enhancements, and safety programs. For
more information, see AOPA Online
( http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...03-4-080x.html )


On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 22:07:53 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote in Message-Id: :


-------------------------------------------------------------------
AVflash Volume 9, Number 44b October 30, 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------------

FAA BILL AMENDED AGAIN
A conference committee of the House and Senate has agreed to strip
language relating to the privatization of 69 FAA control towers from
the long-delayed FAA Reauthorization Bill but privatization opponents
say that's not the end of the debate. The bill, which should have been
passed in September, has been held up over the privatization clause
and it's still not clear how the latest move will affect its passage.
FAA spokesman Greg Martin said the new conference report will likely
be put in front of the House today and passage is expected. But
passage by the Senate is expected to take longer and Martin said a
continuation of the current temporary spending authority, which
expires Friday, will almost certainly be required.
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#185961



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
God Honest Naval Aviation 2 July 24th 03 04:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.