|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 24th 03, 05:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... Paul Tomblin wrote: In a previous article, said: Who stands to gain from ATC privatization? Aren't all of you aware that the Republican Party is philosophically in favor of the marketplace--i.e., free enterprise-- as the means of providing for society's needs? So why are seafood inspectors "inherently governmental", but air traffic control isn't? Because seafood inspectors are like FAA inspectors; inherently governmental. ATC, on the other hand, provides a non-regulatory aircraft separation service, with some secondary, also, non-regulatory, services. Considering what government _IS_, why would this be a government function? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 03:31 AM |
| Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA | PlanetJ | Instrument Flight Rules | 168 | December 6th 03 02:51 PM |
| Preferred Routing or Tower Enroute Control | cefarthing | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | November 30th 03 05:53 PM |
| Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 06:39 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
Hybrid Mode
