![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's with the 3.1 megapixel/6 megapixel effective stuff?
What is it. 3.1 or 6? mike regish "Newps" wrote in message news:XPAkb.595628$cF.260005@rwcrnsc53... Just looked up the S5000, looks like you can get one for $329USD. Might have to upgrade. Trentus wrote: "Michael 182" wrote in message . net... I know, I know - it's way OT, but I'm about to spend significant money on a digital camera, and it seems like the people in here may know more than any advice I'm getting from friends. I posted over on alt.photography, but it is a pretty quiet newsgroup. So, here are some parameters: $1,000, including enough memory to make the camera useful 10x or greater zoom for youth sports - soccer and basketball ability to increase zoom for wildlife, nature photos - maybe attach to my Kowa TSN 822 scope use for pictures in my 182 What else should I be asking? Is this enough info to make a decision? I am leaning toward the Fuji S-5000. Any opinions? You'll love the S-5000 I just bought one recently. Fantastic Camera for the money. Mine - complete with extra memory card and camera case was - $1049 Australian 10x zoom is outstanding. 2 x digital makes it even more so. Through the Lense. Up to 6 megapixel because of the "Super CCD" Extra lenses available for wide angle and greater telephoto is you use the supplied adaptor. Takes standard AA batteries, so if you ever have flat batteries, more can be got from any local store, and rechargeable AA's are cheap. Uses XD memory card, so the camera can store what it just took very quickly, and be ready for another shot quicker. XD is the quickest form of card. Total flexibility from TOTAL MANUAL, to totally auto, and all between. Quality of the shots is amazing, but ignore the camera when it says it wants the flash, most of the time it doesn't need it, the shots are great without it. It's not pocket sized, but is small enough to carry around easily. Trentus |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After reading further I see the experts don't like the camera. I
already have an Olympus C700 with the 10x zoom at 2.1 mp. I want to upgrade but it will be to at least the 4mp range. Also I did not look far enough to see if it had a port to connect the camera to your TV. We really like that feature when travelling. mike regish wrote: What's with the 3.1 megapixel/6 megapixel effective stuff? What is it. 3.1 or 6? mike regish "Newps" wrote in message news:XPAkb.595628$cF.260005@rwcrnsc53... Just looked up the S5000, looks like you can get one for $329USD. Might have to upgrade. Trentus wrote: "Michael 182" wrote in message tt.net... I know, I know - it's way OT, but I'm about to spend significant money on a digital camera, and it seems like the people in here may know more than any advice I'm getting from friends. I posted over on alt.photography, but it is a pretty quiet newsgroup. So, here are some parameters: $1,000, including enough memory to make the camera useful 10x or greater zoom for youth sports - soccer and basketball ability to increase zoom for wildlife, nature photos - maybe attach to my Kowa TSN 822 scope use for pictures in my 182 What else should I be asking? Is this enough info to make a decision? I am leaning toward the Fuji S-5000. Any opinions? You'll love the S-5000 I just bought one recently. Fantastic Camera for the money. Mine - complete with extra memory card and camera case was - $1049 Australian 10x zoom is outstanding. 2 x digital makes it even more so. Through the Lense. Up to 6 megapixel because of the "Super CCD" Extra lenses available for wide angle and greater telephoto is you use the supplied adaptor. Takes standard AA batteries, so if you ever have flat batteries, more can be got from any local store, and rechargeable AA's are cheap. Uses XD memory card, so the camera can store what it just took very quickly, and be ready for another shot quicker. XD is the quickest form of card. Total flexibility from TOTAL MANUAL, to totally auto, and all between. Quality of the shots is amazing, but ignore the camera when it says it wants the flash, most of the time it doesn't need it, the shots are great without it. It's not pocket sized, but is small enough to carry around easily. Trentus |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"mike regish" writes:
What's with the 3.1 megapixel/6 megapixel effective stuff? What is it. 3.1 or 6? It's 3.1. This is something Fuji keeps screwing up on, and it annoys the heck outa me. Here follows more photo-neepery than most people probably care about.... The Fuji "super-CCD" is a good design. It uses octagonal cells (yes, 8-sided, not 6-sided, and not 4-sided), and they're arranged in more of a diamond grid (definitely not in a simple rectangular array). This lets more of each cell be the actual light-sensitive part, which increases sensitivity and lowers noise. Practical trials of Fuji cameras show definite improvements in noise levels and a small increase in resolution compared to a normal, rectangular, array of the same number of pixels (see reports at http://dpreview.com, a very good site for digital camera info). The reports on the Fuji S2 Pro are the ones I'm most familiar with, since that's the camera I was studying (and decided in the end to buy). Now, to get an actual rectangular array of pixels out of this, some processing is needed. The way Fuji does it involves resampling the funny array up to a rectangular grid of twice as many pixels. Then some marketing dweeb decided to try to market those cameras as actually having that many pixels. This, of course, caused lots of people to go off like rockets! On my Fuji S2, except when I need raw mode, the most useful mode is to have it store a 3kx2k (i.e. 6MP) jpeg. So the data path is from 6 million sensors (each reading only *one* of red, green, and blue -- standard Bayer pattern sensor) to 12 million RGB pixels down to 6 million RGB pixels, and then jpeg compression. Luckily the S2 has enough processing power to handle it (it shoots very slightly *faster* than the Nikon D100, the closest model for comparison). -- David Dyer-Bennet, , www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: noguns-nomoney.com www.dd-b.net/carry/ Photos: dd-b.lighthunters.net Snapshots: www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: dragaera.info/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |
Ta-152H at low altitudes | N-6 | Military Aviation | 16 | October 13th 03 03:52 AM |